Movement and experiences in interaction in a case of improvised dance

Authors

  • Maria Virginia Barrios Centro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-4795
  • Mercedes X. Hüg Centro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5991-2480
  • Fernando Bermejo Centro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7738-1062
  • Marcia Cano Brusa Centro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6239-8978

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/18530494e058

Keywords:

Contact Improvisation, personal experience, social interaction, movement, joint improvisation

Abstract

The art of dance is the object of study of different disciplines that are interested in unravelling the elements that come into play when dancing together. Collective improvisation practices are privileged scenarios for the study of basic components of social interaction because they are activities that take place in a restricted temporal-spatial framework, rely heavily on sensorimotor couplings, and also give rise to innovation. Among the various dance styles, contact improvisation (CI) appears as a paradigmatic example of how the creation of shared meaning among dancers allows them to perform sequences of movements based on body contact. Several researches have studied joint improvisation in dance, however, to our knowledge there are no studies on interpersonal coordination in CI that simultaneously integrate registers from a third-person perspective and the experience of the dancers themselves from a first-person perspective. This paper sought to analyse an CI event by integrating both records of personal experience and behavioural dynamics. The qualitative analysis of both records revealed the emergence of diachronic and synchronic categories that allowed us to deepen the interpretation of what happened at both the biomechanical and phenomenological levels. The results obtained allow us to postulate that the role of the interactive synergy of movements would constitute a dimension of utmost relevance in CI situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aguilera, M., Hüg, M., Carreras, X., López, M. L., Tommasini, F. y Bermejo, F. (2021). Estudio exploratorio sobre dinámica relacional de las interacciones espontáneas entre pares en la infancia, en XVIII Reunión Nacional y VII Encuentro Internacional de la AACC, Asociación Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento.

Behnke, E. A. (2003). Contact Improvisation and the lived world. Studia Phaenomenologica, 3, 39–61. https://doi.org/10.7761/SP.3.S1.39

Carter, C. L. (2000). Improvisation in dance. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58(2), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/432097

Clark-Replay, E. (1999). Dancing bodies: Moving beyond Marxian views of human activity, relations and consciousness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 29, 89–108.

Deans, C. Y Pini, S. (2022). Skilled performance in Contact Improvisation: the importance of interkinaesthetic sense of agency. Synthese, 200(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03629-7

Flakne, A. (2019). Contact Improvisation and Embodied Social Cognition. En V. L. Midgelow (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Improvisation in Dance, Oxford Handbooks (2019; online edn, Oxford Academic). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199396986.013.20

He, J. y Ravn, S. (2018). Sharing the dance–on the reciprocity of movement in the case of elite sports dancers. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 17, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-016-9496-5

Kelso J. A. S. (1994). Elementary coordination dynamics. En S. P. Swinnen, H. Heuer, J. Massion y P. Casaer (eds). Interlimb Coordination: Neural, Dynamical, and Cognitive Constraints (pp. 301–318). Academic Press.

Kimmel, M. (2019). A cognitive theory of joint improvisation: The case of Tango Argentino. En V. L. Midgelow (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Improvisation in Dance (pp. 562–592). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199396986.013.32

Kimmel, M. (2021). The micro-genesis of interpersonal synergy. Insights from improvised dance duets. Ecological Psychology, 33(2), 106-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2021.1908142

Kimmel, M., Hristova, D. y Kussmaul, K. (2018). Sources of embodied creativity: interactivity and ideation in contact improvisation. Behavioral Sciences, 8(6), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060052

Kimmel, M. y Irran, C. (2022). Decision-making in Shiatsu bodywork: Complementariness of embodied coupling and conceptual inference. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 245-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09718-7

Kimmel, M. y Preuschl, E. (2016). Dynamic coordination patterns in Tango Argentino: A cross-fertilization of subjective explication methods and motion capture. Dance notations and robot motion, 209-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_10

León, O. G. y Montero, I. (2015). Métodos de Investigación en Psicología. McGraw-Hill.

Merritt, M. (2015). Thinking-is-moving: dance, agency, and a radically enactive mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9314-2

Ollagnier-Beldame, M. y Coupé, C. (2019). Meeting You for the First Time: Descriptive Categories of an Intersubjective Experience, Constructivist Foundations, 14, 2.

Ravn, S. y Høffding, S. (2022). Improvisation and thinking in movement: an enactivist analysis of agency in artistic practices. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21(3), 515-537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09756-9

Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K.. y Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038

Sidall, C. (1997). Round up. A definition. Volume 5, 1979-80. Contact Quarterly’s Contact Improvisation Sourcebook. Contact Editions

Paxton, S. (1997). Contact Improvisation views. Round up. Contact Quarterly’s Contact Improvisation Sourcebook. Contact Editions

Torrents Martín, C., Castañer, M. y Anguera, M. T. (2011). Dancing with complexity: Observation of emergent patterns in dance improvisation. Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 1(80).

Torrents, C., Hristovski, R. y Serre, N. B. (2013). Creatividad y emergencia espontánea de habilidades de danza. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 24, 129-134.

Torrents Martín, C., Ric Á. y Hristovski, R. (2015). Creativity and emergence of specific dance movements using instructional constraints. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038706

Van Alphen, F. (2014). Tango and enactivism: first steps in exploring the dynamics and experience of interaction. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(3), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9267-1

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Barrios, M. V., Hüg, M. X., Bermejo, F., & Cano Brusa, M. (2023). Movement and experiences in interaction in a case of improvised dance. Epistemus. Journal of Studies in Music, Cognition & Culture, 11(2), 058. https://doi.org/10.24215/18530494e058

Issue

Section

Artículos originales de investigación