Inseminación Artificial en la especie porcina: dosis inseminante en relación al lugar de deposición

  • Maricel Compagnoni Cátedra de Reproducción Animal. FCV, UNLP.
  • Claudia Marcela Tittarelli
  • Sara Ines Williams
Palabras clave: porcino, semen, inseminación artificial, dosis inseminante

Resumen

La inseminación artificial en la especie porcina es una herramienta de gran utilidad que permite grandes avances en la industria porcícola, tanto en nuestro país como en el mundo. La inseminación artificial es una herramienta biotecnológica de la reproducción que se aplica en la producción animal con el fin de aumentar la eficiencia productiva, lograr un mayor progreso genético e incrementar el desempeño reproductivo. Existen diferentes métodos de inseminación artificial en porcinos, que permiten variar el volumen y el número de espermatozoides de la dosis inseminante al modificar el lugar de deposición del semen. El objetivo de esta revisión fue recopilar y actualizar información relevante sobre la inseminación artificial en la especie porcina, relacionando la dosis seminal y el método de conservación, con la técnica empleada.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Alm K, Peltoniemi OAT, Koskinen E, Andersson M. 2006. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 41(3): 210-213. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00670.x

Arisnabarreta ER, Allende RA. 2017. Manual de Inseminación Artificial en porcinos. [libro electrónico] Buenos Aires: Ediciones INTA. Disponible en: http://www.ciavt.com.ar/uploads/Banner/72/MANUAL-DE-INSEMINACION-ARTIFICIAL-EN-PORCINOS-Arisnabarreta-Allende.pdf. [15/05/2019]

Brassley P. 2007. Cutting across nature? The history of artificial insemination in pigs in the United Kingdom. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38(2): 442-461. doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.03.008

Bressers HPM, Te Brake JHA, Noordhuizen JPTM. 1991. Oestrus detection in group-housed sows by analysis of data on visits to the boar. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 31(3-4): 183-193. doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90004-H

Broekhuijse MLWJ, Feitsma H, Gadella BM. 2011. Field data analysis of boar semen quality. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 46: 59-63. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01861.x

Cano A, García Mata E. Cría de cerdos. En: Cano A., García Mata E. 1953. Enciclopedia Agropecuaria Argentina. Buenos Aires, Editorial Sudamericana, pp: 71-121.

Claus R, Schopper D, Wagner HG, Weiler U. 1985a. Photoperiodic influences on reproduction of domestic boars, I. Light influences on testicular steroids in peripheral blood plasma and seminal plasma. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe A. 32: 86-98. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1985.tb01920.x

Claus R, Weiler U, Wagner HG. 1985b. Photoperiodic influences on reproduction of domestic boars, II. Light influences on semen characteristics and libido. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe A. 32: 99-109. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1985.tb01921.x

Colenbrander B, Feitsma H, Grooten HJ. 1993. Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 48: 207-15.

Cornou C. 2006. Automated oestrus detection methods in group housed sows: Review of the current methods and perspectives for development. Livestock Science. 105(1-3): 1-11. doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.023

Crabo B. 1991. Preservation of boar semen: a worldwide perspective. Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Boar semen preservation, Beltsville MD, 1990, USDA, pp. 3-12

da Rosa Ulguim R, Vier CM, Betiolo F, Sbardella PE, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Mellagi AP, Bortolozzo FP. 2018. Insertion of an intrauterine catheter for post-cervical artificial insemination in gilts: a case report. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 39(6): 2833-2888. doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n6p2833

Diehl JR, Day BN, Stevermer EJ. 1984. Artificial insemination in swine. Pig industry handbook North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. pp. 3-6.

Feitsma H. 2009. Artificial insemination in pigs, research and developments in The Netherlands, a review. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 37(1): 61-71.

First NL, Short RE, Peters JB, Stratman FW. 1968. Transport and loss of boar spermatozoa in the reproductive tract of the sow. Journal of Animal Science. 27(4): 1037-1040. doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2741037x

Flowers WL, Esbenshade KL. 1993. Optimizing management of natural and artificial matings in swine. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 48: 217-228.

Franco R. 2012. Buenas prácticas de manejo en las distintas etapas productivas. En: Beyli ME, Brunori J, Campagna D, Cottura G, Crespo D, Denegri D, Ducommun ML, Faner C, Figueroa ME, Franco R, Giovannini F, Goenaga P, Lomello F, Lloveras M, Millares P, Odetto S, Panichelli D, Pietrantonio J, Rodríguez Fazzone M, Suárez R, Spiner N, Zielinsky G. 2012. Buenas Prácticas Pecuarias (BPP) para la producción y comercialización porcina familiar, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación. pp. 141-154.

Gadea J, Matás C, Lucas, X. 1998. Prediction of porcine semen fertility by homologous in vitro penetration (hIVP) assay. Animal Reproduction Science. 54(2): 95-108. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00144-4

García-Vázquez FA, Llamas-López PJ, Jacome MA, Sarrias-Gil L, Albors OL. 2019. Morphological changes in the porcine cervix: A comparison between nulliparous and multiparous sows with regard to post-cervical artificial insemination. Theriogenology. 127: 120-29. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.004

Hernández-Caravaca I, Izquierdo-Rico MJ, Matás C, Carvajal JA, Vieira L, Abril D, Soriano-Úbeda C, García–Vázquez FA. 2012. Reproductive performance and backflow study in cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination in sows. Animal Reproduction Science. 136(1-2): 14-22. doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.10.007

Hernández-Caravaca I, Llamas-López PJ, Izquierdo-Rico MJ, Soriano-Úbeda C, Matás C, Gardón JC, García-Vázquez FA. 2017. Optimization of post-cervical artificial insemination in gilts: Effect of cervical relaxation procedures and catheter type. Theriogenology. 90: 147-152. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.11.027

Hormaechea S. 2016. Inseminación artificial post cervical en cerdas. Tesina de pregrado para la orientación Producción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. http://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/1190

Hunter RHF. 1967. The effects of delayed insemination on fertilization and early cleavage in the pig. Reproduction. 13(1): 133-147. doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0130133

Hunter RHF. 1981. Sperm transport and reservoirs in the pig oviduct in relation to the time of ovulation. Reproduction. 63(1): 109-117. doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0630109

Hunter RHF. 1990. Fertilization of pig eggs in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 40: 211-26.

Kemp B, Soede NM. 1997. Consequences of variation in interval from insemination to ovulation on fertilization in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 52: 79-89.

Kemp B, Soede NM, Langendijk P. 2005. Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in sows. Theriogenology. 63(2): 643-656. doi10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.038

Kirkwood RN, Vadnais ML, Abad M. 2008. Practical application of seminal plasma. Theriogenology. 70(8): 1364-67. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.018

Knox RV. 2016. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 85(1): 83-93. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.009

Knox RV, Breen SM, Willenburg KL, Roth S, Miller GM, Ruggiero KM, Rodriguez-Zas SL. 2004. Effect of housing system and boar exposure on estrus expression in weaned sows. Journal of Animal Science. 82(10): 3088-93. doi.org/10.2527/2004.82103088x

Knox R, Levis D, Safranski T, Singleton W. 2008. An update on North American boar stud practices. Theriogenology. 70(8): 1202-08. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.036

Lamberson WR, Safranski TJ. 2000. A model for economic comparison of swine insemination programs. Theriogenology. 54(5): 799-807. doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00391-5

Langendijk P, Soede NM, Bouwman EG, Kemp B. 2000. Responsiveness to boar stimuli and change in vulvar reddening in relation to ovulation in weaned sows. Journal of Animal Science. 78(12): 3019-26. doi.org/10.2527/2000.78123019x

Langendijk P, Soede NM, Kemp B. 2005. Uterine activity, sperm transport, and the role of boar stimuli around insemination in sows. Theriogenology. 63(2): 500-13. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.027

Langendijk P, Soede NM, Kemp B. 2006. Effects of boar stimuli on the follicular phase and on oestrous behaviour in sows. Society of Reproduction and Fertility. 62: 219-30.

Llamas-López PJ, López-Úbeda R, López G, Antinoja E, García-Vázquez FA. 2019. A new device for deep cervical artificial insemination in gilts reduces the number of sperm per dose without impairing final reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 10(1): 11. doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0313-1

Lovell JW, Getty R. 1968. Fate of semen in the uterus of the sow: histologic study of endometrium during the 27 hours after natural service. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 29(3): 609-25.

Maes DGD, Mateusen B, Rijsselaere T, De Vliegher S, Van Soom A, de Kruif A. 2003. Motility characteristics of boar spermatozoa after addition of prostaglandin F2α. Theriogenology. 60(8): 1435-43. doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00132-8

Marotta E. 1973. Extracción de semen en el cerdo: técnica y material. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria. 54: 25-34.

Marotta E. 1978. Inseminación artificial en la especie porcina. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria. 59: 310-12.

Mezalira A, Dallanora D, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP. 2005. Influence of sperm cell dose and post insemination backflow on reproductive performance of intrauterine inseminated sows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 40(1): 1-5.

doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00524.x

Nissen AK, Soede NM, Hyttel P, Schmidt M, D'hoore L. 1997. The influence of time of insemination relative to time of ovulation on farrowing frequency and litter size in sows, as investigated by ultrasonography. Theriogenology. 47(8): 1571-82. doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00162-3

Olesen AK, Hansen C. 2009. Intrauterine insemination of sows by using a two-chamber semen bag system. Proceeding of 8th International Conference on Pig Reproduction, Nottingham, UK, 2009, pp. 81-82.

Palma GA & Brem G. Biotecnología de la reproducción. En: Palma GA. 2001. Biotecnología de la Reproducción. Buenos Aires, Ediciones INTA. pp 1-14.

Peltoniemi OAT, Alm K, Andersson M. 2009. Uterine insemination with a standard AI dose in a sow pool system. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 44(3): 414-418. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01094.x

Peña FJ, Dominguez JC, Carbajo M, Anel L, Alegre B. 1998. Treatment of swine summer infertility syndrome by means of oxytocin under field conditions. Theriogenology. 49(4): 829-36. doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00032-6

PigCHAMP. Data summary. 2012. Benchmark Farms. http://benchmark.farms.com/2012_production_trends.html. [06/11/2013].

Rault JL, Morrison RS, Hansen CF, Hansen LU, Hemsworth PH. 2014. Effects of group housing after weaning on sow welfare and sexual behavior. Journal of Animal Science. 92(12): 5683-92. doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8238

Reed HCB. Artificial insemination. In: Cole DJA, Foxcroft GR. 1982. Control of pig reproduction. London, Butterworth Scientific. pp. 65–90.

Reicks DL, Levis DG. 2008. Fertility of semen used in commercial production and the impact of sperm numbers and bacterial counts. Theriogenology. 70(8): 1377-79. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.019

Riesenbeck A. 2011. Review on international trade with boar semen. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 46: 1-3. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01869.x

Rillo SM. 1982. Reproducción e inseminación artificial porcina. Barcelona, Editorial AEDOS.

Roca J, Carvajal G, Lucas X, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA. 2003. Fertility of weaned sows after deep intrauterine insemination with a reduced number of frozen-thawed spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 60(1): 77-87. doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01330-4

Rodriguez-Martinez H, Kvist U, Saravia F, Wallgren M, Johannisson A, Sanz L, Peña FJ, Martínez EA, Roca J, Vázquez JM, Calvete JJ. 2009. The physiological roles of the boar ejaculate. Control of Pig Reproduction VIII. 66: 1-21.

Rodríguez-Martínez H, Saravia F, Wallgren M, Tienthai P, Johannisson A, Vázquez J, Martínez E, Roca J, Sanz L, Calvete JJ. 2005. Boar spermatozoa in the oviduct. Theriogenology. 63(2): 514-35. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.028

Rodriguez-Martinez H, Tienthai P, Suzuki K, Funahashi H, Ekwall H, Johannisson A. 2001. Involvement of oviduct in sperm capacitation and oocyte development in pigs. Reproduction Cambridge Supplement. 58: 129-45.

Rozeboom KJ, Reicks DL, Wilson ME. 2004. The reproductive performance and factors affecting on-farm application of low-dose intrauterine deposit of semen in sows. Journal of animal science. 82(7): 2164-68. doi.org/10.2527/2004.8272164x

Rozeboom KJ, Troedsson MHT, Crabo BG. 1998. Characterization of uterine leukocyte infiltration in gilts after artificial insemination. Reproduction. 114(2): 195-99. doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1140195

Soede NM, Helmond FA, Schouten WGP, Kemp B. 1997. Oestrus, ovulation and peri-ovulatory hormone profiles in tethered and loose-housed sows. Animal Reproduction Science. 46(1-2): 133-48. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(96)01609-0

Soede NM, Noordhuizen JPTM, Kemp B. 1992. The duration of ovulation in pigs, studied by transrectal ultrasonography, is not related to early embryonic diversity. Theriogenology. 38(4): 653-66. doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90028-P

Soede NM, Wetzels CCH, Zondag W, De Koning MAI, Kemp B. 1995. Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. Reproduction. 104(1): 99-106. doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1040099

Soede NM, Kemp B. 1997. Expression of oestrus and timing of ovulation in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 52: 91-103.

Steverink DWB, Soede NM, Bouwman EG, Kemp B. 1997. Influence of insemination–ovulation interval and sperm cell dose on fertilization in sows. Reproduction. 111(2): 165-71. doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1110165

Steverink DWB, Soede NM, Bouwman EG, Kemp B. 1998. Semen backflow after insemination and its effect on fertilisation results in sows. Animal Reproduction Science. 54(2): 109-19. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00146-8

Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J, Gil MA, Parrilla I, Cuello C, Caravajal G, Lucas X, Vazquez JL. 2005. Improving the efficiency of sperm technologies in pigs: the value of deep intrauterine insemination. Theriogenology. 63(2): 536-47. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.043

Vazquez JM, Roca J, Gil MA, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Vazquez JL, Martínez EA. 2008. New developments in low-dose insemination technology. Theriogenology. 70(8): 1216-24. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.013

Watson PF, Behan JR. 2002. Intrauterine insemination of sows with reduced sperm numbers: results of a commercially based field trial. Theriogenology. 57(6): 1683-93. doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00648-9

Weiler U, Claus R. 1990. Endocrine aspects of testicular function, especially hormones in the seminal plasma and their fate in the female reproductive tract: testicular steroids and their relevance for male and female reproductive functions. In: Johnson LA, Rath D. 1990. Boar semen preservation II. Berlin, Paul Parey Scientific Publishers. pp. 41–61.

Weitze K. 2000. Infertilidade estacional no suino. The 3rd Simposio Internacional Inseminaçào Artificial em Suinos. Porto Alegre, Brasil, pp. 50.

Weitze KF, Wagner-Rietschel H, Waberski D, Richter L, Krieter J. 1994. The onset of heat after weaning, heat duration, and ovulation as major factors in AI timing in sows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 29(5): 433-43. doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1994.tb00590.x

Willenburg KL, Miller GM, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Knox RV. 2003. Effect of boar exposure at time of insemination on factors influencing fertility in gilts. Journal of Animal Science. 81(1): 9-15. doi.org/10.2527/2003.8119

Williams S, Fernandez V. Evaluación, procesamiento y conservación de semen. Inseminación artificial. En: Williams S. 2015. Atlas de Reproducción Porcina. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Inter-médica, pp. 25-32.

Woelders H, Matthijs A. 2001. Phagocytosis of boar spermatozoa in vitro and in vivo. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) Supplement. 58: 113-27.

Yeste M, Estrada E, Pinart E, Bonet S, Miró J, Rodríguez-Gil JE. 2014. The improving effect of reduced glutathione on boar sperm cryotolerance is related with the intrinsic ejaculate freezability. Cryobiology. 68(2): 251-61. doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.02.

Publicado
2019-12-03
Cómo citar
Compagnoni, M., Tittarelli, C. M., & Williams, S. I. (2019). Inseminación Artificial en la especie porcina: dosis inseminante en relación al lugar de deposición. Analecta Veterinaria, 39(2), 041. https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e041
Sección
Artículos de revisión

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a