Applying a geometric morphometric surface semilandmark-based approach for assessing sexual dimorphism in cranial bones

Germán Manríquez; Bastián Escobar-Ramírez

doi:10.24215/18536387e068

Authors

Germán Manríquez Centre for Quantitative Analysis in Dental Anthropology (CA2), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Institute of Dental Sciences Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Physical Anthropology Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3376-8804
Bastián Escobar-Ramírez Centre for Quantitative Analysis in Dental Anthropology (CA2), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9362-9259

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/18536387e068

Keywords:

sexual dimorphism, cranial trait, geometric morphometrics, 3D surface semilandmarks

Abstract

Traditionally, sex estimation in human skulls has been carried out applying non-metric and inter-landmark distance approaches. Such estimation has substantially improved with the introduction of geometric morphometric semilandmark-based registration, representing a useful tool for capturing the complex morphology of 3D surfaces, particularly in human skulls. Taking in account these improvements, the main purpose of this study is to show the benefits of these techniques for assessing by means of a quantitative, hypothesis testing approach the differential phenotypic expression of sexual dimorphism in human cranial traits, using the frontal bone, the mastoid process of the temporal bone, and the zygomatic bone as proxies. According to our main results: i) accuracy and precision of sex estimation is higher when the shape variable is included in the analysis than when it is not, ii) numerical classification tends to be more accurate in males than in females for both shape and size components of sexual dimorphism, and iii) a single trait or two traits in combination would be more successful in sex classification than the three traits taken as a whole. The introduction in the present study of a surface semilandmark-based approach for quantitatively assessing sexual dimorphism in human skull considerably improves the capture of sexual dimorphic signatures, corroborating the importance of the information carried by the surface of the frontal bone, mastoid process, and zygomatic bone. Our results suggest that shape and size components should be considered as relevant factors in making a differential, bone- dependent sex assessment in human crania.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Adams, D. C. y Otárola-Castillo, E. (2013). Geomorph: An r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(4), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12035

Adams, D., Rohlf, F. y Slice, D. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution.’ Italian Journal of Zoology, 71(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000409356545

Bardua, C., Felice, R. N., Watanabe, A., Fabre, A. C. y Goswami, A. (2019). A Practical Guide to Sliding and Surface Semilandmarks in Morphometric Analyses. Integrative Organismal Biology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obz016

Barreaux, N., Espinoza M.C., Flores, S., Galimany, J., González, R., Jara, K., Krapivka, S., Morales, H. y Quiñones, E. (2015). Puesta en valor de la colección osteológica subactual de Santiago (Sesión de Congreso) V Congreso Chileno de Conservación y Restauración. DIBAM-AGCR (pp. 183-189). https://www.cncr.gob.cl/noticias/v-congreso-chileno-de-conservacion-yrestauracion

Baylac, M. y Frieß, M. (2006). Fourier descriptors, Procrustes superimposition, and data dimensionality: an example of cranial shape analysis in modern human populations. En D.E. Slice (Ed.), Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (pp. 145-165). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27614-9_6

Bigoni, L., Velemínská, J. y Brůžek, J. (2010). Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 61(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.004

Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press.

Boyer, D., Lipman, Y., St Clair, E., Puente, J., Patel, B., Funkhouser, T., Jernvall, J. y Daubechies, I. (2011). Algorithms to automatically quantify the geometric similarity of anatomical surfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(45), 18221-18226. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112822108

Boyer, D., Puente, J., Gladman, J., Glynn, C., Mukherjee, S., Yapuncich, G. y Daubechies, I. (2015). A new fully automated approach for aligning and comparing shapes. Anatomical Record (Hoboken, N.J.: 2007), 298(1), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23084

Carlson, K. J., Grine, F. E. y Pearson, O. M. (2007). Robusticity and sexual dimorphism in the postcranium of modern hunter-gatherers from Australia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 134(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20617

Chovalopoulou, M. E., Valakos, E. D. y Manolis, S. K. (2016). Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the vault and midsagittal curve of the neurocranium in a modern Greek population sample. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 67(3), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2015.09.007

Del Bove, A., Profico, A., Riga, A., Bucchi, A. y Lorenzo, C. (2020). A geometric morphometric approach to the study of sexual dimorphism in the modern human frontal bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 173(4), 643-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24154

Díaz-Jarufe, P. (2010). Valor predictivo de los rasgos anatómicos del cráneo utilizados en la estimación visual del sexo en población chilena: un análisis de morfometría geométrica. (Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile). https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/106304

DiGangi, E. A. y Moore, M. K. (Eds.) (2013). Research Methods in Human Skeletal Biology. Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385189-5.00001-7

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. y Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175- 191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Franklin, D., Freedman, L., Milne, N. y Oxnard, C. E. (2006). A geometric morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in the crania of indigenous southern Africans. South African Journal of Science, 102(5), 229-238. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC96545

Garvin, H. M. (2012). Adult Sex Determination: Methods and Application. A Companion to Forensic Anthropology, 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255377.ch12

Garvin, H. M. y Ruff, C. B. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in skeletal browridge and chin morphologies determined using a new quantitative method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 147(4), 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22036

Gonzalez, P., Bernal, V. y Perez, S. (2011). Analysis of sexual dimorphism of craniofacial traits using geometric morphometric techniques. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 21(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1109

Gonzalez, P. N., Perez, S. I. y Bernal, V. (2010). Ontogeny of robusticity of craniofacial traits in modern humans: a study of South American populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 142(3), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21231

Green, H. y Curnoe, D. (2009). Sexual dimorphism in Southeast Asian crania: A geometric morphometric approach. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 60(6), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.001

Gunz, P. y Mitteroecker, P. (2013). Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6292

Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P. y Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology, 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27614-9_3

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. y Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9.

Jung, H. y Woo, E. J. (2016). Evaluation of Mastoid Process as Sex Indicator in Modern White Americans using Geometric Morphometrics. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61(4), 1029-1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13079

Kimmerle, E. H., Ross, A. y Slice, D. (2008). Sexual dimorphism in America: Geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(1), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00627.x

Lewis, C. J. y Garvin, H. M. (2016). Reliability of the Walker Cranial Nonmetric Method and Implications for Sex Estimation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61(3), 743-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13013

Martin R, S. K. (1957). Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in systematischer Darstellung. Fischer.

Meza-Escobar, O., Galimany, J., González-Oyarce, R. y Höpfl, N. B. (2023). The Colección Osteológica Subactual de Santiago: Origin and Current State of a Documented Skeletal Collection from Chile, Latin America. Forensic Sciences, 3(1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci3010008

Perlaza, N. A. (2014). Sex determination from the frontal bone: A geometric morphometric study. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(5), 1330-1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12467

Petaros, A., Garvin, H. M., Sholts, S. B., Schlager, S. y Wärmländer, S. K. T. S. (2017). Sexual dimorphism and regional variation in human frontal bone inclination measured via digital 3D models. Legal Medicine, 29, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2017.10.001

Pomidor, B., Makedonska, J. y Slice, D. (2016). A Landmark-Free Method for Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0150368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150368

Pretorius, E., Steyn, M. y Scholtz, Y. (2006). Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20251

Püschel, T. (2013). Biomechanical modelling of Human Femora: a comparison between Agriculturalist and Hunter-Gatherers using FEA, GMM and Beam Theory. (Tesis de Maestría, University of York, York). https://www.thomaspuschel.com/publication/msc/

R Core Team. (2008). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rodríguez, F. (2017). Dimorfismo Sexual del Diente Canino en Población Santiaguina Actual aplicando Morfometría Geométrica. Tesis para optar al título de Antropólogo. (Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile). https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/152568

Rohlf, J. y Marcus, L. (1993). A revolution morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8(4), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-J

Rosas, A. y Bastir, M. (2002). Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 117(3), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10023

Schlager, S. (2017). Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R: R-Packages for Geometric Morphometrics, Shape Analysis and Surface Manipulations. Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis: Methods, Implementation and Applications, 217-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810493-4.00011-0

Schlager, S., Jefferis, G. y Ian, D. (2018). Package “Morpho” Type Package Title Calculations and Visualisations Related to Geometric Morphometrics. R package Version 2.11. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/Morpho/index.html

Schlager, S. y Rüdell, A. (2017). Sexual Dimorphism and Population Affinity in the Human Zygomatic Structure—Comparing Surface to Outline Data. Anatomical Record, 300(1), 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23450

Shearer, B. M., Sholts, S. B., Garvin, H. M. y Wärmländer, S. K. T. S. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in human browridge volume measured from 3D models of dry crania: A new digital morphometrics approach. Forensic Science International, 222(1-3), 400.e1-400.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.06.013

Slice, D. (2007). Geometric Morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 261-281. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ANTHRO.34.081804.120613

Stratovan Corporation. (2018). Stratovan Checkpoint (Version 2018.08.07). (Software). Sacramento, CA: Stratovan Corporation Incorporated.

Suazo Galdames, I. C., Zavando Matamala, D. A. y Smith, R. L. (2008). Sex Determination Using Mastoid Process Measurements in Brazilian Skulls. International Journal of Morphology, 26(4), 941-944. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022008000400025

Ubelaker, D. y Buikstra J. (1994). Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, 44-206.

Valenzuela, C. Y. y Harb, Z. (1977). Socioeconomic assortative mating in Santiago, Chile: a demonstration using stochastic matrices of mother-child relationships applied to ABO blood groups. Social Biology, 24(3), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1977.9988285

Walker, P. L. (2008). Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 136(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20776

Walrath, D. E., Turner, P. y Bruzek, J. (2004). Reliability Test of the Visual Assessment of Cranial Traits for Sex Determination. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 125, 132-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10373

Watanabe, A. (2018). How many landmarks are enough to characterize shape and size variation? PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0198341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198341

Weber, G. W. (2015). Virtual Anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 156(S59), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22658

Williams, B. A. y Rogers, T. L. (2006). Evaluating the Accuracy and Precision of Cranial Morphological Traits for Sex Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(4), 729-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00177.x

Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D. y Sheets, H. (2012). Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. (2a ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.