Memoria y enfoque enactivo: análisis sobre el rol del cuerpo y las interacciones sociales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe174Palabras clave:
enactivismo, memoria, cognición corporizada, sensoriomotor, recuerdos socialesResumen
El enactivismo es una rama de las perspectivas cognitivas corporizadas que sostiene que la cognición emerge del acoplamiento que se da entre el organismo y su entorno. Este enfoque podría ofrecer una mirada alternativa para comprender aspectos de la memoria que representan desafíos para los abordajes tradicionales. La presente revisión bibliográfica busca avanzar en el tema a través de preguntas sobre cómo se genera, cómo se mantiene en el tiempo y para qué sirve la memoria. En el artículo se sintetizan las bases conceptuales del enactivismo para posteriormente revisar investigaciones que discuten sobre los procesos constructivos y las bases sensoriomotoras de la memoria y, finalmente, investigaciones que problematizan la formación y evocación de recuerdos sociales y colectivos.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Abel, M. y Bäuml, K. H. (2020). Social interactions can simultaneously enhance and distort memories: Evidence from a collaborative recognition task. Cognition, 200, 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104254
Abrahamson, D., Dutton, E. y Bakker, A. (2021). Towards an Enactivist Mathematics Pedagogy. In The Body, Embodiment, and Education: An Interdisciplinary Approach. S. A. Stolz (Ed.). Routledge,
Alessandroni, N. y Rodríguez, C. (2019). On perception as the basis for object concepts: A critical analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 26(2/3), 321–356. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19027.ale
Atkinson, R. C. y Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory. En K. W. Spence y J. T. Spence. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol.2). Academic Press.
Auvray, M. y Rohde, M. (2012). Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181
Barber, S. J., Castrellon, J. J., Opitz, P. y Mather, M. (2017). Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures. Memory & Cognition, 45, 716–730. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0694-3
Barnier, A. J., Harris, C. B., Morris, T. y Savage, G. (2018). Collaborative facilitation in older couples: Successful joint remembering across memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02385
Barnier, A. J., Klein, L., y Harris, C. B. (2017). Transactive memory in small, intimate groups: More than the sum of their parts. Small Group Research, 49(1), 62–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417712439
Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., Harris, C. B. y Wilson, R. A. (2008). A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.002
Bartlett, F. C. (1995/2010). Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511759185
Bermejo, F., Di Paolo, E. A., Hüg, M. X. y Arias, C. (2015). Sensorimotor strategies for recognizing geometrical shapes: A comparative study with different sensory substitution devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00679
Bermúdez-Rattoni, F. y McGaugh, J. L. (2017). Memory reconsolidation and memory updating: Two sides of the same coin? Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 142(Part A), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2017.05.002
Bickhard, M. H. (2019). Dynamics is not enough: an interactivist perspective. Human Development, 63(3–4), 227–244.
Blumen, H. M. y Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701804495
Blumen, H. M. y Rajaram, S. (2009). Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks. Memory, 17(8), 840–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903266931
Brouillet, D. (2020). Enactive memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00114
Brouillet, T., Michalland, A.-H., Martin, S. y Brouillet, D. (2021). When the action to be performed at the stage of retrieval enacts memory of action verbs. Experimental Psychology, 68(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000507
Brouillet, D. y Versace, R. (2019). The nature of the traces and the dynamics of memory. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 8(6), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20190806.12
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G. y Freund, H.-J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400-404.
Burdman, F. (2015). El post-cognitivismo en cuestión: extensión, corporeización y enactivismo. Principia, 19(3), 475-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2015v19n3p475
De Bruin, L. y De Haan, S. (2012). Enactivism & social cognition: In search of the whole story. Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2012.4.1.225
De Jaegher H. (2013). Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00015
De Jaegher, H. y Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. y Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009
De Jaegher, H., y Di Paolo, E. (2013). Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00345
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
Di Paolo, E. A., Barandiaran, X. E., Beaton, M. y Buhrmann, T. (2014). Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget’s theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 551.
Di Paolo, E. A., (2016). Enactivismo. En C. Vanney, I. Silva y J. F. Franck, Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral. http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Enactivismo
Di Paolo, E., Buhrmann, T. y Barandiaran, X. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford University Press.
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M. y De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. En J. Stewart, J. R. Stewart, O. Gapenne y E. A. Di Paolo (Eds). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33-88). MIT Press.
Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. P. y Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.009
Dumas, G., Kelso, J. A. y Nadel, J. (2014). Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00882
Fitzpatrick, R. (2016). Enacting memory: Rethinking our capacity to remember. The University of Edinburgh.
Froese, T. (2012). From adaptive behavior to human cognition: A review of enaction. Adaptive Behavior, 20(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712311433892
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K. y Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719428
Gardner, H. (1988/2011). La nueva ciencia de la mente. Historia de la revolución cognitiva (L. Wolfson, Trad). Paidós.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x97000010
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J. y Keil, P. G. (2014). Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts. Memory Studies, 7(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698014530619
Ianì, F. (2019). Embodied memories: Reviewing the role of the body in memory processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1747–1766. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01674-x
Ianì, F. y Bucciarelli, M. (2017). Mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of a speaker’s gestures on the listener. Journal of Memory and Language, 96, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.05.004
Ianì, F., y Bucciarelli, M. (2018). Relevance of the listener’s motor system in recalling phrases enacted by the speaker. Memory, 26, 1084–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1433214
Ianì, F., Foiadelli, A. y Bucciarelli, M. (2019). Mnemonic effects of action simulation from pictures and phrases. Acta Psychologica, 194, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.20
Ihde, D., y Malafouris, L. (2019). Homo faber Revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-719.01.012
Kelly, S. D.,Manning, S.M. y Rodak, S. (2008).Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00067.x
Kensinger, E. A., Choi, H.-Y., Murray, B. D. y Rajaram, S. (2016). How social interactions affect emotional memory accuracy: Evidence from collaborative retrieval and social contagion paradigms. Memory & Cognition, 44, 706–716. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0597-8
Lee, J., Nader, K. y Schiller, D. (2017). An update on memory reconsolidation updating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.006
Lozano, M. D., (2014). La perspectiva enactivista en educación matemática: todo hacer es conocer. Educación Matemática, 26(1), 162-182.
Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K. y Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand waving: Action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109(1), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.007
Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. MIT Press.
Maturana Romesín, H. y Varela García, F. (1973). De máquinas y seres vivos: Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo. Lumen.
McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memory. A century of consolidation. Science, 287(5451), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.2
Meade, M. L., Nokes, T. J. y Morrow, D. G. (2009). Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task. Memory, 17(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802524240
Miles, L., Nind, L., Henderson, Z.y Macrae, C. N. (2010). Moving memories: Behavioral synchrony and memory for self and others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 457-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.006
Morgado Bernal, I. (2005). Psicobiología del aprendizaje y la memoria. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 10, 221-233.
Nader, K. (2015). Reconsolidation and the dynamic nature of memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7, A021782. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021782
Nyberg, L., Petersson, K. M., Nilsson, L.-G., Sandblom, J., Ǻberg, C. e Ingvar, M. (2001). Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions. NeuroImage, 14(2), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0801
Prezioso, E. y Alessandroni, N. (2023). Enacting memories through and with things: Remembering as material engagement. Memory Studies, 16(4), 962–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221108475
Osiurak, F. y Badets, A. (2017). Use of tools and misuse of embodied cognition: Reply to Buxbaum (2017). Psychological Review, 124(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000065
Rajaram, S. y Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: Cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388763
Schacter, D. L. (2022). The seven sins of memory: An update. Memory, 30(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1873391
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N. y Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The future of memory: Remembering, imagining, and the brain. Neuron, 76(4), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001
Scully, I. D., Napper, L. E. y Hupbach, A. (2017). Does reactivation trigger episodic memory change? A meta-analysis. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 142(Part A), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.12.012
Steiner, P. (2014). Enacting anti-representationalism. The scope and the limits of enactive critiques of representationalism. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(2), 43-86.
Van Dam, W. O., Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Bekkering, H. y Lindemann, O. (2013). Embodied grounding of memory: Toward the effects of motor execution on memory consolidation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2310–2328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.777084
Varela, F. (1988/2005). Conocer. Las ciencias cognitivas: tendencias y perspectivas. Cartografía de las ideas actuales (C. Gardini, Trad.). Gedisa.
Varela, F., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press
Weber, A. y Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020368120174
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R. y Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923–929.
Weldon, M. S. y Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1160–1175. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1160
Zimmer, H. D., Cohen, R. L., Guynn, M. J., Engelkamp, J., Kormi-Nouri, R. y Foley, M. A. (2001). Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? Oxford University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Verónika Diaz Abrahan, Fernando Bermejo, Mercedes Hüg
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (veaThe Effect of Open Access).