China como contrincante semi-periférico: recuperando el Estado en el análisis de sistemas-mundo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23142766e195Palabras clave:
China, construcción estatal, semiperiferia, sistemas mundoResumen
Este artículo examina el ascenso económico de China y sus características institucionales en la acumulación de capital. Utilizando el enfoque de sistemas mundo y la literatura histórica relevante, se destaca la doble autonomía del Estado chino, resultado de la convergencia de procesos históricos: el período imperial tardío y la Revolución China de 1949. Se introduce el concepto de "contrincante semi-periférico" para describir su posición híbrida en la jerarquía de riqueza. El Estado chino moldea y disciplina a los actores capitalistas para ascender en las cadenas globales de valor, alterando su posición en la dinámica centro-periferia. Esta capacidad de imponer transformaciones profundas en la estructura jerárquica de riqueza global distingue a China como agente relevante. El artículo contribuye a la teoría política del Estado y su dinámica en el contexto global.
Descargas
Citas
Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1991). Before European hegemony: The world system A.D. 1250-1350. Oxford University Press.
Acemoglu, D. y Robinson, J. A. (2019). The Narrow Corridor: How Nations Struggle for Liberty. Penguin.
Arrighi, G. (2005). States, markets and capitalism, East and West. En M. H. Miller (Ed.), Worlds of capitalism: Institutions, governance and economic change in the era of globalization (pp. 123-159). Routledge.
Arrighi, G. (2009). Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the 21st Century. Verso.
Arrighi, G. y Drangel, J. (1986). The stratification of the world-economy: An exploration of the semiperipheral zone. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 10(1), 9-74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241047
Arrighi, G. y Zhang, L. (2011). Beyond the Washington consensus: A new Bandung? En J. Shefner y M. P. Fernández-Kelly (Eds.), Globalization and beyond: New examinations of global power and its alternatives (pp. 25-57). Penn State Press.
Babones, S. J. (2012). Position and mobility in the contemporary world-economy: A structuralist perspective. En S. J. Babones y C. Chase-Dunn (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of World-Systems Analysis (pp. 327-335). Routledge.
Boltho, A. y Weber, M. (2015). Did China follow the East Asian development model?. En B. Naughton y K. S. Tsai (Eds.), State capitalism, institutional adaptation, and the Chinese miracle (pp. 240-264). Cambridge University Press.
Brook, T. (2005). The Chinese state in Ming society. Routledge.
Carchedi, G. y Roberts, M. (2021). The economics of modern imperialism. Historical Materialism, 29(4), 23-69. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341959
Carnoy, M. (1984). The State and Political Theory. Princeton University Press.
Chase-Dunn, C. (2018). Continuities and transformations in the evolution of World-Systems. En T. D. Hall (Ed.), Comparing Globalizations (pp. 13-35). Springer International Publishing.
Chase-Dunn, C. y Sokolovsky, J. (1983). Interstate systems, world-empires and the capitalist world-economy: A response to Thompson. International Studies Quarterly, 27(3), 357. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600688
Chen, S. (2017). The State, the gentry, and local institutions: The Song dynasty and long-term trends from Tang to Qing. Journal of Chinese History 中國歷史學刊, 1(1), 141-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/jch.2016.30
De Graaff, N., Ten Brink, T. y Parmar, I. (2020). China’s rise in a liberal world order in transition – introduction to the FORUM. Review of International Political Economy, 27(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1709880
Deng, X. (1984). Build socialism with chinese characteristics. Foreign Lenguage Press.
Elvin, M. (1973). The pattern of the chinese Past. Stanford University Press.
Fernandez, V. R. y Moretti, L. (2020). Un nuevo sistema mundo desde el Sur Global: gran convergencia y desplazamiento geográfico acelerado. Geopolítica(s). Revista de Estudios sobre Espacio y Poder, 11, 313-344. https://doi.org/10.5209/geop.69203
Fernández, V. R., Moretti, L. y Ormaechea, E. (2022). Divergent convergence: Complementing theoretical approaches for understanding the rise of the Global South and the challenges for “the Rest”. Journal of World-Systems Research, 28(1), 98-126. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2022.1032
Flint, C. y Taylor, P. J. (2018). Political geography: World-economy, nation-state, and locality (Seventh edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Frank, A. G. (1998). ReORIENT: Global economy in the Asian Age. University of California Press.
Friedman, E. (1999). Reinterpreting the asianization of the world and the role of the state in the rise of China. En D, A, Smith, D. J. Solinger y S. C. Topik (Eds.), States and sovereignty in the global economy (pp. 246-263) . Routledge.
Grell-Brisk, M. (2017). China and global economic stratification in an interdependent world. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.87
Grinin, L. y Korotayev, A. (2015). Great divergence and great convergence: A global perspective. Springer International Publishing.
Hamashita, T. (2008). China, East Asia and the global economy: Regional and historical perspectives (M. Selden y L. Grove, Trads.). Routledge.
Hamashita, T. (2009). The tribute trade system and modern Asia. En K. L. Pomeranz (Ed.), The Pacific in the age of Early Industrialization (pp. 130-155). Routledge.
Hu, A., Gao, Y., Yan, Y. y Wei, X. (2014). China’s role in the rising of the South: Vision for 2030. IDS Bulletin, 45(4), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-5436.12089
Huang, C.-H. y Kang, D. C. (2022). State formation through emulation: The East Asian model. Cambridge University Press.
Huang, P. C. C. (1990). The peasant family and rural development in the Yangzi Delta, 1350-1988. Stanford University Press.
Huang, Y. (2008). Capitalism with Chinese characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State. Cambridge University Press.
Huang, Y. (2011). Rethinking the Beijing consensus. Asia Policy, 11, 1-26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24905024
Hui, V. T. (2005). War and State formation in ancient China and early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Hung, H. (2015). The China boom: Why China will not rule the world . Columbia University Press.
Hung, H. (2018). The tapestry of Chinese capital in the Global South. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0123-7
Ikeda, S. (1996). The history of the capitalist world-system vs. the history of East-Southeast Asia. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 19(1), 49-77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241353
Karatasli, S. S. (2020). Global inequality and capitalist world-economy, 1500—Present: A critique of neo-modernization theories. En I. Rossi (Ed.), Challenges of globalization and prospects for an inter-civilizational world order (pp. 307-330). Springer International Publishing.
Karataşlı, Ş. S. (2017). The capitalist world-economy in the longue durée changing modes of the global distribution of wealth, 1500–2008. Sociology of Development, 3(2), 163-196, https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.163
Katzenstein, P. J. (2003). Japan, technology and Asian regionalism in comparative perspective. En G. Arrighi, T. Hamashita y M. Selden (Eds.), The Resurgence of East Asia. 500, 150 and 50 year perspectives (pp. 214-258). Routledge.
Korzeniewicz, R. P. (2017). The World-System as unit of analysis: Past contributions and future advances. Routledge.
Li, M. (2008). The rise of China and the demise of the capitalist world economy. NYU Press.
Li, M. (2016). China and the twenty-first-century crisis. Pluto Press.
Li, S., Vertinsky, I. y Zhou, D. (2004). The emergence of private ownership in China. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1145-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00055-9
Ma, D. (2006). Shanghai-based industrialization in the early 20th century: A quantitative and institutional analysis. Working Papers of the Global Economic History Network (GEHN), 18(06), http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/22473
Ma, D. (2012). Political institutions and long-run economic trajectory: Some lessons from two millennia of chinese civilization. En M. Aoki, T. Kuran y G. Roland (Eds.), Institutions and comparative economic development (pp. 78-98). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
MacMillan, M. (2008). Nixon, Kissinger, and the opening to China. En F. Logevall y A. Preston (Eds.), Nixon in the World: American foreign relations, 1969–1977 (p. 107-125). Oxford University Press.
Meisner, M. (1999). Mao’s China and After: A history of the People’s Republic, Third Edition. Simon and Schuster.
Merino, G. (2022). Nuevo momento geopolítico mundial: la pandemia y la aceleración de las tendencias de la transición históricaespacial contemporánea. Estudos Internacionais: Revista de Relações Internacionais da PUC Minas, 9(4), 106-130. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021v9n4p106-130
Mielants, E. (2005). The rise of European hegemony: The political economy of South Asia and Europe compared, A.D. 1200–A.D. En C. K. Chase-Dunn (Ed.), The historical evolution of world-systems (1ª ed., pp. 124-154). Palgrave Macmillan.
Mielants, E. (2008). The origins of capitalism and the «Rise of the West». Temple University Press.
Miranda, J. (2018). How China did not transform into a market economy. En J. J. Nedumpara y W. Zhou (Eds.), Non-market economies in the global trading system: The special case of China (pp. 65-97). Springer.
Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. MIT Press.
Naughton, B. (2021). The rise of China’s industrial policy, 1978 to 2020. Academic Network of Latin America and the Caribbean on China.
Nogueira, I. y Qi, H. (2019). State and capitalist class in China’s economic transition: From great compromise to strained alliance. PERI
Pasciuti, D. S. y Payne, C. R. (2017). Illusion in crisis?: World-economic and zonal volatility, 1975–2013. En R. P. Korzeniewicz (Ed.), The World-System as unit of analysis. Past contributions and future advances (pp. 70-81) Routledge.
Perkins, D. H. (2018). The complex task of evaluating China’s economic reforms. En R. Garnaut, L. Song y C. Fang (Eds.), China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development: 1978–2018 (1st ed., pp. 135-154). ANU Press.
Petry, J. (2020). Financialization with Chinese characteristics? Exchanges, control and capital markets in authoritarian capitalism. Economy and Society, 49(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1718913
Qian, J. y Sng, T. (2021). The state in Chinese economic history. Australian Economic History Review, 61(3), 359-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12226
Rowe, W. T. y Brook, T. (2012). China’s last empire: The Great Qing. Belknap Press.
Ru, S. H. (2022). The State formation of late Qing China within global geopolitical dynamics. Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 22(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1215/15982661-9767212
Schoppa, K. (2014). From empire to People’s Republic. En W. A. Joseph (Ed.), Politics in China: An introduction (2ª ed., pp. 44-71). Oxford University Press.
Shie, V. H. y Weng, C.-Y. (2011). Destabilizing the semiperiphery: The counterturn of China’s ascendance in the world-economy. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 10(3-4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1163/156914911X610367
Stasavage, D. (2020). The decline and rise of Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Su, X. y Lim, K. F. (2023). Capital accumulation, territoriality, and the reproduction of state sovereignty in China: Is this “new” state capitalism? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(3), 697-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221093643
Tan, L. (2005). China’s Transition to a Market Economy. En L. Tan (Ed.), The Paradox of Catching Up: Rethinking State-Led Economic Development (pp. 116-162). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598072_5
Tian, G. y Chen, X. (2022). The origin of the traditional socialist economic system and the soviet model. En G. Tian y X. Chen (Eds.), China’s reform: History, logic, and future (pp. 71-77). Springer Nature.
Tilly. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European States, A.D. 990-1990 (Revised edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Der Pijl, K. (2012). Is the East still red? The contender state and class struggles in China. Globalizations, 9(4), 503-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2012.699921
von Glahn, R. (2016). The economic history of China: From antiquity to the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). Dependence in an interdependent world: The limited possibilities of transformation within the capitalist world economy. African Studies Review, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/523574
Wallerstein, I. (1979). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1984). The three instances of hegemony in the history of the capitalist world-economy. En Current issues and research in macrosociology (pp. 100-108). Brill.
Wallerstein, I. (1995). Historical capitalism with capitalist civilization. Verso.
Wallerstein, I. (1999). States? Sovereignty? The dilemmas of capitalists in an age of transition. En D. A. Smith, D. J. Solinger y S. Topik (Eds.), States and sovereignty in the global economy (pp. 20-33). Psychology Press.
Wang, F.-L. (2005). Organizing through division and exclusion: China’s Hukou system. Stanford University Press.
Wang, Y. (2022). The rise and fall of imperial China. Princeton University Press.
Wong, R. B. (1997). China transformed: Historical change and the limits of European experience. Cornell University Press.
Yamada, N. (2012). The multiplicity of national development in the world-system: A critical perspective. En S. J. Babones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of world-systems analysis (1ª pub., pp. 112-120). Routledge.
Yao, Y. (2011). Beijing consensus or Washington consensus: What explains China’s economic success? Development Outreach, 13(1), 26-31. https://www.sidalc.net/search/Record/dig-okr-109866098
Ye, M. (2020). Fragmentation and mobilization: Domestic politics of the Belt and Road in China. En S. Zhao (Ed.) China’s Global Reach: The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) (pp. 91-119). Routledge.
Yifu, J. y Shen, Z. (2018). Reform and development strategy. En R. Garnaut, L. Song y C. Fang (Eds.), China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development (pp. 117-134). ANU Press.
Zhao, D. (2009). The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 416-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338800
Zhao, D. (2015). The Confucian-legalist State: A new Theory of Chinese History. Oxford University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Luciano Moretti, Joel Sidler, Victor Ramiro Fernández
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra. A partir de noviembre del 2020 los artículos se publicarán en la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución- NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Acorde a estos términos, el material se puede compartir (copiar y redistribuir en cualquier medio o formato) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material otra obra), siempre que a) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista y URL de la obra), b) no se use para fines comerciales y c) se mantengan los mismos términos de la licencia.
Previo a esta fecha los artículos se publicaron en la revista bajo una Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (BY-SA 2.5). - Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
