Two models of constitutional order: The warranties of normative order and the measures of governmental coercion in Bonn´s Law

Authors

  • Claudio Contreras UNNOBA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/25916386e100

Keywords:

normativity, administration, intervention, Constitution, legality

Abstract

In the present article we will make an analysis about the situation of the Federal Republic of Germany in her first´s years after de Second great war. On one hand we will focus on the government politics and the notion of Ordnung: the juridical debate on the constitutional order was posed in terms of fundamental rigths. The problem there was the formal and limitative character of the subjective guaranties, and the material contain of the social and administrative laws. Ernst Forsthoff has made a critic on the notion of social Rule of law on the basis of a duality between legality and administration. But in front of this constitutional conception the economic Counsel of the federal Republic works on the notion of order in terms of regulation and government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Claudio Contreras, UNNOBA

Abogado, Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Dr. en Ciencias Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional de la Plata (UNLP). Prof. Titular de Derecho Político y docente investigador, Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA).

References

Arendt, H. (1993). La condición humana. Barcelona: Paidós.

Abendroth, W. (1977). Der demokratische und sozialer Rechtsstaat ais politischer Auftrag. Suhrkamp: Ffm.

Abendroth, W. (1978). Der bügerliche Rechtsstaat. Suhrkamp: Ffm.

Abendroth, W. (1968). Zurn Begriff des demokratischen und sozialen Rechtsstaat im GG der BRD (1954). En E. Forsthoff (Hrsg.), Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Sozialistaatlichkeit. Darmstadt.

Benjamin, W. (2007). Conceptos de la filosofía de la Historia. Buenos Aires: Caronte.

Bilger, F. (1963). La pensé economique allemande dans l´Allemagne contemporaine. Paris: Librarie general du droit et jurisprudence.

Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Paris: Gallimard.

Forsthoff, E. (1954). Verfassungsprobleme de Sozialstaates. Hamburg: M. Hohidipur.

Forsthoff, E. (1959). Rechtsfragen der leistenden Verwaltung, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Forsthoff, E. (1975). Concepto y esencia del Estado social de derecho. Madrid: IEEPP.

Forsthoff, E. (1977). El Estado de la sociedad industrial. Madrid: IEP.

Landwerlin, G. (1987). Estado social de derecho: Forsthoff y abendroth, dos interpretaciones políticas. Madrid: Revista de Estudios políticos.

Schmitt, C. (2000). Der Hüter der Verfassung. Berlin: Dunker & Humboldt.

Schmitt, C. (2002). Legalidad y Legitimidad. Buenos Aires: Struhart & Cía.

Schmitt, C. (2009) La tiranía de los valores. Buenos Aires. Hydra.

Schlink, B. (2000). Weimar a jurisprudence of crisis. Berkeley: University of California presses.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1984). Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia. Barcelona: Folio.

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Contreras, C. (2021). Two models of constitutional order: The warranties of normative order and the measures of governmental coercion in Bonn´s Law. Anales De La Facultad De Ciencias Juridicas Y Sociales De La Universidad Nacional De La Plata, 18(51), 100. https://doi.org/10.24215/25916386e100

Issue

Section

Derecho Político