Processes of design and revision of university training proposals. Methodological dialogues

Abstract

In university institutions, inclusion policies aimed at promoting fairer societies put both decision-makers and managers and those involved in teaching at the centre of the issue. A teaching whose center is learning requires theoretical, methodological and ethical sustenance that collaborates with the reflection - both on the curricular text and with the work in the classrooms - and allows designing methodological formats that achieve the desired aspirations (Araujo, 2018). This paper presents two experiences of reviewing training proposals from national universities, UNSAM and UNER. In turn, it performs a reflexive exercise on the working methodology used in the experiences, considering that any process of change, reform or curricular innovation, part of an academic political framework that functions as a computer of meaning and configures the modes and procedures of that process.