Study of the effect of shoeing on equine locomotion using inertial sensors

Authors

  • Paula Cánepa Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5596-1792
  • Juan Manuel Chilo Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
  • Martin Rodolfo Chilo Profesional Independiente
  • Marcos Gadze Profesional Independiente
  • Viviana Edith De Palma Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e086

Keywords:

equine, shoeing, kinematic, inertial sensors, data logging

Abstract

This article describes the design and implementation of an ad hoc data logger system to monitor kinematic effects imposed by trimming and shoeing protocols on the dynamic balance of the equine hoof. This method is a low-cost solution, that uses inertial measurement sensors (IMU's). Data representation in open software is presented and the average acceleration and angular velocity recorded on days 0, 15, 30, 40 after implementing a standard trimming and hoof shoeing protocol are statistically analyzed. The results indicated significant differences between measurements (p<0.05). Conditioning favored the dorsopalmar, vertical and lateromedial hoof balance, increased the load on the palmar region and optimized the contact and support until day 40, when the load was distributed asymmetrically in lateromedial direction. Association between shoeing practices and hoof balance was significant (r=0,97), so their application, as well as their frequency of implementation, should be taken into consideration when evaluating the effect on the animal.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
169
Oct 07 '24Oct 10 '24Oct 13 '24Oct 16 '24Oct 19 '24Oct 22 '24Oct 25 '24Oct 28 '24Oct 31 '24Nov 01 '24Nov 04 '2412
|
HTML views
32
Oct 07 '24Oct 10 '24Oct 13 '24Oct 16 '24Oct 19 '24Oct 22 '24Oct 25 '24Oct 28 '24Oct 31 '24Nov 01 '24Nov 04 '242.0
|
Other format views
50
Oct 07 '24Oct 10 '24Oct 13 '24Oct 16 '24Oct 19 '24Oct 22 '24Oct 25 '24Oct 28 '24Oct 31 '24Nov 01 '24Nov 04 '243.0
|

References

Antonioli ML, Canola PA, de Carvalho JRG, Fonseca MG, Ferraz GC. 2023. Immediate effect of hoof trimming on hoof and thoracic joint angles in Mangalarga mares. Animals: an open access journal from MDPI. 13(15):2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152490

Atkins CA, Pond KR, Madsen CK, Moorman VJ, Roman Muniz IN, Archibeque SL, Grandin T. 2019. Sensor analysis and initial assessment of detectable first hoof contacts and last break-overs as unique signal fluctuations for equine gait. Translational Animal Science. 3(4):1389-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz089

Chateau H, Degueurce C, Jerbi H, Crevier-Denoix N, Pourcelot P, Audigiéa F, PasquiBoutard V, Denoix JM. 2002. Three-dimensional kinematics of the equine interphalangeal joints: articular impact of asymmetric bearing. Veterinary Research. 33(4):371-82.

https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2002023

Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. 2017. The rol of biomechanical analysis of horse and rider in equitation science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 190:123-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.011

Davidson EJ. 2018. Lameness evaluation of the athletic horse. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice. 34(2):181-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2018.04.013

Greve L, Dyson S. 2020.What can we learn from visual and objective assessment of nonlame and lame horses in straight lines, on the lunge and ridden? Equine Veterinary Education. 32(9):479-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13016

Hagen J, Bos R, Brouwer J, Lux S, Jung FT. 2021. Influence of trimming, hoof angle and shoeing on breakover duration in sound horses examined with hoof‐mounted inertial sensors. The Veterinary Record. 189(4):e450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vetr.450

Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Carnall H, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. 2021. Influence of speed, ground surface and shoeing condition on hoof breakover duration in galloping thoroughbred racehorses. Animals: an open access journal from MDPI. 11(9):2588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ani11092588

Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala Schultz PJ. 2005. Association between subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses with experimentally induced forelimb lameness. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 66(10):1805-15.

https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1805

Keegan KG, Yonezawa Y, Pai PF, Wilson DA. 2002. Accelerometer-based system for the detection of lameness in horses. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation. 38:107-12.

Kelleher ME, Burns TD, Werre SR, White NA.2021. The immediate effect of routine hoof trimming and shoeing on horses'gait. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 102:103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jevs.2021.103633

Leelamankong P, Estrada R, Mählmann K, Rungsri P, Lischer, C. 2020. Agreement among equine veterinarians and between equine veterinarians and inertial sensor system during clinical examination of hindlimb lameness in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal. 52(2):326-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13144

Leśniak K, Williams J, Kuznik K, Douglas P. 2017. Does a 4-6week shoeing interval promote optimal foot balance in the working equine? Animals: an open access journal from MDPI. 7(4):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7040029

Moorman VJ, Reiser RF, Peterson ML, McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE. 2013. Effect of forelimb lameness on hoof kinematics of horses at a walk. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 74(9):1192-7. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.9.1192

Serra Bragança FM, Rhodin M, Van Weeren PR. 2018.On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: what evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model? The Veterinary Journal. 234:11-23.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.006

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Cánepa, P., Chilo, J. M., Chilo, M. R., Gadze, M., & De Palma, V. E. (2024). Study of the effect of shoeing on equine locomotion using inertial sensors. Analecta Veterinary, 44, 086. https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e086

Issue

Section

Technical reports