The ‘face to face’ meeting in criminal proceedings

Chronicle of a pre-trial detention foretold

Authors

  • Lucas Massaccesi Unidad Funcional de Defensa nº3 (Fuero Penal) del Dpto. Judicial La Plata, Poder Judicial de la Provincia de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971e108

Keywords:

immediacy, orality, pre-trial detention, criminal proceeding

Abstract

The criminal proceedings which take place in La Plata, Buenos Aires province, are carried out -with exceptions- without holding the hearings that the law mandates in order to provide opportunities for prosecutors and judges to meet face to face with the people that they will charge/judge later in court. Hence, since the beginnings of the investigations until the moment of the trial (oral or written one -‘shorten’-), judicial authorities make important decisions such as allowing an accused person to remain free until trial or, on the contrary, imposing pre-trial detention, without even a minimum of immediacy with those who will bear their serious decisions. Nevertheless, that despersonalizating inertia is exceptionally interrupted, as it happened in Cristian’s case, when a young man provisionally detained from La Plata’s city, managed to meet face to face with the judges and prosecutors of his case, and thanks to that, he regained his freedom. This paper narrates Cristian’s case, and it aims to be a reflection on the influence that, in criminal proceedings, has o can have the direct contact between prosecutors/judges and the people that are being acussed or judged.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lucas Massaccesi, Unidad Funcional de Defensa nº3 (Fuero Penal) del Dpto. Judicial La Plata, Poder Judicial de la Provincia de Buenos Aires

Abogado de la Facultad de Cs. Jurídicas y Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Especialista en Magistratura -Mención Derecho Penal- de la Universidad Nacional de La Matanza. Abogado de la Unidad Funcional de Defensa nº3 (Fuero Penal) del Dpto. Judicial La Plata, Poder Judicial de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.

References

Berger, P. L. y Luckman T. (1968). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Ginzburg, C. (2000). Ojazos de madera. Nueve reflexiones sobre la distancia. Barcelona: Península.

González, L. (2017). Protocolo de dirección de Audiencias de Medidas cautelares. Sucre: CEJA.

González García, J. M. (1989). La Máquina Burocrática: Afinidades Electivas Weber-Kafka. Madrid: Antonio Machado.

Gramsci, A. ([1930-1932] 1999). Cuadernos de la Cárcel. Tomo 2. Méjico D.F./ Puebla: Ediciones Era / Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Martínez, Santiago (2009). Oralidad, reforma del procedimiento recursivo y operadores del sistema – Reflexiones acerca de un acertado fallo, pp.1900. En: Revista N º 11 de Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.

Massaccesi L. (2021). La Mirada Humanizante. Tesis de Especialización en Magistratura en la UNLaM. Inédita.

Weber, M. ([1922] 2002). Economía y Sociedad. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Zaffaroni E. R.(1998). En busca de las penas perdidas. Deslegitimación y Dogmática Jurídico Penal. Buenos Aires: Ediar.

Published

2022-10-21

How to Cite

Massaccesi, L. (2022). The ‘face to face’ meeting in criminal proceedings: Chronicle of a pre-trial detention foretold . Law and Social Sciences, (27), 108. https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971e108