Human rights, poverty and capitalism
Abstract
In this article, I examine the interplay between state obligations to eradicate extreme poverty and realize socio-economic rights under International Human Rights Law (IHRL) and some of the legal regimes and economic paradigms that sustain global capitalism. Advocates of rights-based solutions to poverty tend to focus on how mechanisms to advance relevant categories of human rights, above all socio-economic rights, can be strengthened. Their analyses typically ignore questions of how other legal rights and legal regimes may function as obstacles to the eradication of poverty and the realization of human rights. I contest the long-standing assumption of IHRL that the goal of realizing human rights—and socio-economic rights in particular—is compatible with the operations of global capitalism, and I seek to demonstrate that the legal regimes necessary to sustain capitalist political economy are, in fact, routinely productive of poverty and of violations of socio-economic rights.
Downloads
References
Allison, J. (31 de enero de 2019). Make the Moral Case for Capitalism. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/make-moral-case-Capitalism
Arzabe, P. H. (2001). Human Rights: A New Paradigm. En W. van Genugten y C. Perez-Bustillo (Eds.), The Poverty of Rights: Human Rights and the Eradication of Poverty. Zed Books.
Asamblea General de la ONU. (1986). Declaración sobre el Derecho al Desarrollo. 4 December 1986 A/RES/41/128. https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-right-development
Balakrishnan, R. y Heintz, J. (29 de octubre de 2015). How inequality threatens all human rights. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/openglobalrights-openpage/how-inequality-threatens-all-human-rights/
Ballestero, A. (2019). A Future History of Water. Duke University Press.
Bhambra, G. y Holmwood, J. (2018). Colonialism, Postcolonialism and the Liberal Welfare State. New Political Economy, 23(5), 574-587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1417369
Bhandar, B. (2012). Disassembling Legal Form: Ownership and the Racial Body. En M. Stone, I. Rua Wall y C. Douzinas (Eds.), New Critical Legal Thinking: Law and the Political (pp. 112-127). Birkbeck Law Press.
Bianchi, A. (2008). Human rights and the magic of jus cogens. European Journal of International Law, 19(3), 491-508. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn026
Bilchitz, D. (2014). Socio-economic rights, economic crisis, and legal doctrine. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), 710-739. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou044
Birchall, D. (2019). Human rights on the altar of the market: The Blackstone letters and the financialisation of housing. Transnational Legal Theory, 10(3-4), 446-471.
Boyer, R. (2011). Are there laws of motion of capitalism?. Socio-Economic Review, 9(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq026
Burrow, S. (28 de octubre de 2019). UN treaty on business and human rights vital for economic and social justice. Social Europe. https://www.socialeurope.eu/un-treaty-on-business-and-human-rights-vital-for-economic-and-social-justice
Chadwick, A. (2019). Law and the political economy of hunger. Oxford University Press.
Chang, H. J. (2014). Economics: A User’s Guide. Pelican.
Chase Dunn, C. y Grell-Brisk, M. (26 de noviembre de 2019). World-System Theory. Oxford Bibliographies. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0272.xml
Comité DESC. (1990). General Comment. En Note by the Secretariat, Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies. UN Doc E/1991/23.
Comité Europeo de Derechos Sociales. (2010). Carta Social Europea. COE.
Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas. (2020). Human rights and extreme poverty. Res 8/11 A/HRC/44/L.19.
Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford University Press.
de Soto, H. (2001). The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. Black Swan.
De Wet, E. y Vidmar, J. (2010). Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Dehm, J. (2018). Highlighting inequalities in the histories of human rights: Contestations over justice, needs and rights in the 1970s. Leiden Journal of International Law, 31(4), 871-895. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000456
Dowell Jones, M. (2004). Contextualising the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights: Assessing the economic deficit. (Vol. 80). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Finlay, G. (2021). China, extreme poverty and consequentialist theories of human rights. En S. Egan y A. Chadwick (Eds.), Poverty and Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 38-53). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hale, R. (1923). Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State. Political Science Quarterly, 38(3), 470-494. https://doi.org/10.2307/2142367
Hall, M. (13 de septiembre de 2023). Why Are There No Profits in a Perfectly Competitive Market? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/031815/why-are-there-no-profits-perfectly-competitive-market.asp#:~:text=In%20a%20perfectly%20competitive%20market%2C%20firms%20can%20only%20experience%20profits,producing%20infinitely%20divisible%2C%20homogeneous%20products
Heilbroner, R. (1986). The Nature and Logic of Capitalism. W. W. Norton & Company.
In Argentina Javier Milei faces an economic crisis. (20 de noviembre de 2024). The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/11/20/in-argentina-javier-milei-faces-an-economic-crisis
Ince, O. U. (2018). Between equal rights: Primitive accumulation and capital’s violence. Political Theory, 46(6), 885-914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591717748
Kennedy, D. (2010). Three Globalizations of Legal Thoughts: 1850-2000. En D. Trubek y A. Santos (Eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal, (pp.19-73). Cambridge University Press.
Khoo, S. M. (2021). (Post) human rights, poverty and inequality: problems of algocracy, pharmocracy and chemocracy. En S. Egan y A. Chadwick (Eds.), Poverty and Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 91-104). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Linarelli, J., Salomon, M. E. y Sornarajah, M. (2018). The misery of international law: confrontations with injustice in the global economy. Oxford University Press.
Maclntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.
Marks, S. (2008). Exploitation as an International Legal Concept. En S. Marks (Ed.), International law on the left: re-examining Marxist legacies (pp. 281-307). Cambridge University Press.
Marx, K. (1967). Capital: Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy. Memory of the world program of Unesco/ Amazon.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Allen Lane.
McClure, J. (2021). The legal construction of poverty: examining historic tensions between property rights and subsistence rights. En S. Egan y A. Chadwick (Eds.), Poverty and Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 54-67). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Moore, D. (2004). The Second Age of the Third World: From Primitive Accumulation to Global Public Goods? Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185354
Moyn, S. (2018). Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Harvard University Press.
Naciones Unidas. (2020). World Social Report 2020: Inequality in a Rapidly Changing World. United Nations.
Nolan, A. (2018). Privatization and Economic and Social Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 40(4), 815-858. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0047
O’Brien, D. P. (2004). The Classical Economists Revisited. Princeton University Press.
OACDH. (2012). Guiding Principles on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights. (18 de julio), A/HRC/21/39.
OCDE. (2020). The trade policy implications of global value chains. OCDE.
Owens, J. (2022). Mobile Phones. Ethical Consumer.
Pistor, K. (2019). The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press.
Rajagopal, B. (2013). Right to Development and Global Governance: Old and New Challenges Twenty-Five Years On. Human Rights Quarterly, 35(4), 893-909. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0063
Robinson, M. (2005). What Rights Can Add to Good Development Practice. En P. Alston y M. Robinson (Eds.), Human Rights and Development: Towards Mutual Reinforcement (pp. 25-42). Oxford University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank's economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic literature, 44(4), 973-987. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.4.973
Scholtz, L. (20 de noviembre de 2012). Teleological Interpretation. Freie Universität Berlin. https://wikis.fu-berlin.de/display/oncomment/Teleological+Interpretation#Footnote1
Sepúlveda, M. (2009). Colombia, The Constitutional Court’s Role in Addressing Social Injustice. En M. Langford (Ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence, Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (pp. 144-162). Cambridge University Press.
Skogly, S. I. (2002). Is there a right not to be poor?. Human Rights Law Review, 2(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/2.1.59
Streeck, W. (2017). How will capitalism end?: Essays on a failing system. Verso Books.
Tarver, E. (28 de septiembre de 2020). First Mover: What It Means, Examples, and First Mover Advantages. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/firstmover.asp#:~:text=A%20first%20mover%20is%20a,before%20competitors%20enter%20the%20arena
Van Beuren, G. (2007). Fullfiling Law’s Duty to the Poor. En T. Pogge (Ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor (pp 1-20). Oxford University Press.
Vandenhole, W. (2021). Planet and people: making human rights distributive by design. En S. Egan y A. Chadwick (Eds.), Poverty and Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp.102-121). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Williams, Z. (7 de abril de 2020). We say we value key workers, but their low pay is systematic, not accidental. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/07/value-key-workers-low-pay
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anna Chadwick
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución, compartir igual, de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
Derecho y Ciencias Sociales por Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
