Propiety as a social right

Authors

Keywords:

adequate housing, economic, social and cultural rights, international human rights law, right to property

Abstract

This paper introduces the added value of a broad approach to human rights to balance the relationship between tenant’s right to adequate housing and landlord’s right to property. Firstly, it presents briefly how international human rights law treaties and monitoring bodies have dealt with, and chosen not to deal with, the right to property. Secondly, it introduces the right to adequate housing as proclaimed as a social right in international human rights law. Third, it argues that the human rights community, particularly those working on economic, social and cultural rights –such as housing –should engage with the right to property directly. Finally, the paper articulates the beginnings of a proposal to reinterpret property and its social function from a holistic approach to human rights, one that takes adequate housing and other socio-economic rights seriously when holding public authorities to account.

Downloads

References

Akkermans, B. (2021). Sustainable Ownership – new obligations towards achieving a sustainable society. European Property Law Journal, 10(2-3), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2021-0014

Alexander, G. S. (2018). Property and human flourishing. Oxford University Press.

Casla, K. (2020). Rights and responsibilities: Protecting and fulfilling economic and social rights in times of public health emergency. En Law and Human Rights: Essex Dialogues. A Project of the School of Law and Human Rights Centre (pp. 11-17). University of Essex.

Casla, K. (2022). Unpredictable and damaging? A human rights case for the proportionality assessment of evictions in the private rental sector. European Human Rights Law Review, 2022(3), 253-272.

Casla, K. (2023). The Right to Property Taking Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights Seriously. Human Rights Quarterly, 45(2), 171-204. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0010

Casla, K. (2023). Función social de la propiedad, vivienda adecuada y derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Lex Social, 13(2), 1-21.https://doi.org/10.46661/lexsocial.8138

Dagan, H. (2021). A liberal theory of property. Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, N. M. (2011). Sketches for a Hamilton Vernacular as a Social Function of Property. Fordham Law Review, 80(3), 1053-1070.

Duguit, L. (1920). Les transformations générales du droit privé depuis le Code Napoléon. Librairie Félix Alcan.

Duranti, M. (2017). The conservative human rights revolution: European identity, transnational politics, and the origins of the European convention. Oxford University Press.

Dyal Chand, R. (2022). Sharing the climate. Columbia Law Review, 122(3), 581-648.

Epstein, R. A. (2023). The plasticity of property: legal transitions between property rights regimes for different resources. En E. Nordtveit (Ed.), The Changing Role of Property Law (pp. 14-53). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Foster, S. y Bonilla, D. (2011). The social function of property: A comparative law perspective. Fordham Law Review, 80, 101-113.

Fox O’Mahony, L. y Roark, M. L. (2023). Property as an asset of resilience: Rethinking ownership, communities and exclusion through the register of resilience. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 36(4), 1477-1507.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10000-7

Gerhart, P. M. (2014). Property law and social morality. Cambridge University Press.

Global Initiative for Economic Social and Cultural Rights. (2023). 2022 Yearbook of The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. GI-ESCR.

Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone: The future of the system that rules the world. Harvard University Press.

Moore, R. (2023). Property: The Myth that Built the World. Faber & Faber.

O’Cinneide, C. (2020). The Potential and Pitfalls of Intersectionality in the Context of Social Rights Adjudication. En S. Atrey y P. Dunne (Eds.), Intersectionality and human rights law (pp. 59-82). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Oren, M. L. y Alterman, R. (2022). The right to adequate housing around the globe: Analysis and evaluation of national constitutions. En S. Agrawal (Ed.), Rights and the city: Problems, progress and practice. Forthcoming University of Alberta Press.

Tooze, A. (28 de octubre de 2022). Welcome to the world of the polycrisis. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/498398e7-11b1-494b-9cd3-6d669dc3de33

Underkuffler, L. S. (2015). A theoretical approach: the lens of progressive property. En S. Bright y S. Blandy (Eds.), Researching Property Law (pp. 11-23). Hart Publishing.

Van der Walt, A. J. (2014). The modest systemic status of property rights. Journal of Law, Property and Society, (1), 15-106.

Walsh, R. (2021). Property rights and social justice: progressive property in action. Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, S. (2011). Litigating Housing Rights in Johannesburg’s Inner City: 2004—2008. South African Journal on Human Rights, 27(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2011.11865008

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Casla, K. (2024). Propiety as a social right. Law and Social Sciences, 75–97. Retrieved from https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/dcs/article/view/18533