O digital commons e a esfera pública digital: como avançar na democracia digital hoje
como avançar na democracia digital hoje
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23143924e038Palavras-chave:
bens comuns digitais, esfera pública digital, capitalismo digital, mídia de serviço público, plataformasResumo
Este artigo pergunta: quais são os potenciais democráticos dos bens comuns digitais e da esfera pública digital? Primeiro, o artigo identifica dez problemas do capitalismo digital. Em segundo lugar, ele se envolve com a noção de esfera pública digital. Terceiro, esboça o conceito do bens comuns digitais (digital commons) Em quarto lugar, algumas conclusões são tiradas e dez sugestões para o avanço da democracia digital são apresentadas.
Este artigo contribui para a teorização e análise do capitalismo digital, plataformas de Internet, esfera pública digital, bens comuns digitais, democracia digital, plataformas de Internet de serviço público, plataformas de Internet de sociedade civil / comunidade, cooperativas de plataforma, acesso aberto, acesso aberto corporativo / capitalista, e acesso aberto de diamante. Este trabalho também descreve dez problemas do capitalismo digital, bem como dez princípios do progressismo digital, uma política que avança a esfera pública e os bens comuns e, portanto, a democracia (digital) na sociedade.
Existem dimensões naturais, econômicas, políticas e culturais dos bens comuns e dos bens comuns digitais. Capitalismo, serviço público e mídia da sociedade civil / mídia comunitária / cooperativas são três formas de organização e governança da Internet e das mídias / tecnologias digitais. O capitalismo coloniza e mercantiliza os bens comuns (digitais) e a esfera pública (digital). Os modelos alternativos estão localizados fora do capitalismo, nos domínios da esfera pública e da sociedade civil, bem como em suas interações.
Downloads
Referências
Bauwens, M., Kostakis, V., & Pazaitis, A. (2019). Peer to Peer: The Commons Manifesto. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book33
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Benkler, Y. (2013). Commons and growth: The essential role of open commons in market economies. University of Chicago Law Review, 80, 1499–555.
Berlinguer, M. (2020). New commons: Towards a necessary reappraisal. Popular Communication, 18(3), 201–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1781857
Birkinbine, B. J. (2020). Incorporating the Digital Commons: Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book39
Broumas, A. (2020). Intellectual Commons and the Law: A Normative Theory for Commons-Based Peer Production. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book49
Cody, S. (2008). After Kelly: ‘After Dark’, David Kelly and lessons learned. Lobster, 55.
Der Standard. (2001). Der ‘Club 2’ ging vor 25 Jahren erstmals auf Sendung. Der Standard Online, 5 October. Available at: www.derstandard.at/story/733146/der-club-2-ging-vor-25-jahren-erstmals-auf-sendung (last accessed 7 October 2020).
Euler, J. (2018). Conceptualizing the commons: Moving beyond the goods-based definition by introducing the social practices of commoning as vital determinant. Ecological Economics, 143, 10–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.020
Fuchs, C. (2014a). Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society, 23(1), 97–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X13502117
Fuchs, C. (2014b). Social media and the public sphere. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(1), 57–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552
Fuchs, C. (2018a). Digital Demagogue: Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Trump and Twitter. London: Pluto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21215dw
Fuchs, C. (2018b). The Online Advertising Tax as the Foundation of a Public Service Internet. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book23
Fuchs, C. (2020a). Communication and Capitalism: A Critical Theory. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book45
Fuchs, C. (2020b). Nationalism on the Internet: Critical Theory and Ideology in the Age of Social Media and Fake News. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429343476
Fuchs, C. (2021). Social Media: A Critical Introduction, 3rd edition. London: Sage.
Fuchs, C., & Sandoval, M. (2013). The diamond model of open access publishing: Why policy makers, scholars, universities, libraries, labour unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious. tripleC, 11(2): 428–43. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.502
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding Knowledge as Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001
Knoche, M. (2020). Science communication and open access: The critique of the political economy of capitalist academic publishers as ideology critique. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 18(2): 508–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1183
Köhler, B., David, S., & Blumtritt, J. (2010). The slow media manifesto. Available at: http:// en.slow-media.net/manifesto (last accessed 2 November 2019).
Marx, K. (1867) [1990]. Capital. Volume 1. London: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1894) [1992]. Capital. Volume 3. London: Penguin.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848) [1976]. Manifesto of the Communist Party. In Marx and Engels Collected Works (MECW) Volume 6 (pp. 477–519). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Papadimitropoulos, V. (2020). The Commons: Economic Alternatives in the Digital Age. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book46
Rauch, J. (2018). Slow Media. Why Slow’ is Satisfying, Sustainable, and Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834
Sandoval, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial activism? Platform co-operativism between subversion and co-optation. Critical Sociology, 46(6), 801–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519870577
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Scholz, T., & Schneider, N. (Eds.) (2016). Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, a New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet. New York: OR Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv62hfq7
Splichal, S. (2007). Does History Matter? Grasping the Idea of Public Service at its Roots In G. F. Lowe & J. Badoel (Eds.), From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media, RIPE@2007 (pp. 237–56). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Utman, J. S. (2020). Subversive communication against neoliberalism. Popular Communication, 18(3), 155–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1781858
Žižek, S. (2010). How to Begin From the Beginning. In C. Douzinas & S. Žižek (Eds.), The Idea of Communism (pp. 209–26). London: Verso.
