Posibilidades de las Humanidades Digitales en los proyectos de Ciencia Ciudadana en Brasil y Portugal

Amanda Santos Witt; Fabiano Couto Corrêa da Silva

doi:10.24215/27187470e053

Authors

Amanda Santos Witt Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-3018
Fabiano Couto Corrêa da Silva Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5014-8853

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/27187470e053

Keywords:

Citizen Science, Open Science, Digital Humanities, Information and Communication Technologies

Abstract

In the digital humanities, transdisciplinarity points to new methods, devices and research associated with the digital in the Humanities. This study analyzes social participation in scientific projects, a bias advocated by Citizen Science. The methodological procedures included the study of Citizen Science projects in Brazil and Portugal in the field of humanities. The Citizen Science digital platforms of these countries were used, in addition to the mapping of projects carried out by the Portuguese Citizen Science Network. The objective was to verify the forms of social participation provided by these projects, mediated by digital technologies. It was concluded that most of the initiatives are guided by collaborative, democratic and educational principles. In addition, the technologies used by the projects connect citizen scientists and researchers, which favors the realization of scientific processes and social integration through the process of co-creation of solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fabiano Couto Corrêa da Silva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Adjunct Professor, Department of Information Science/FABICO, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

References

Albagli, S. (2015). Ciência aberta em questão. En S. Albagli, M. L. Maciel y A. H. Abdo (Orgs.), Ciência aberta, questões abertas (pp. 9-25). IBICT, UNIRIO. https://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/1060

Albagli, S., Clinio, A. y Raychtock, S. (2014). Ciência Aberta: correntes interpretativas e tipos de ação. Liinc em Revista, 10(2), 434-450.

https://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/3593

Albagli, S., Py, H. y Iwana, A.Y. (2020). Geovisualização de dados e ciência aberta e cidadã - a experiência da Plataforma LindaGeo. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 14(2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/2/000452/000452.html

Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jorda, R., Mccallie, E., Phillips, T.,Shirk, J. y Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research:

Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Inquiry Group Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519688

European Citizen Science Association. (2015). Dez princípios da ciência cidadã. ECSA. https://zenodo.org/records/5127534

Fundación Ciencia Ciudadana. (2017). Guía para conocer la ciencia ciudadana. Ciencia Ciudadana. https://cienciaciudadana.cl/descarga-la-guia-para-conocer-la-ciencia-ciudadana/

Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: moverview and typology of participation. En D.Z SuiSui, S. Elwood, y M.F. Goodschild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice (pp. 105-122). Springer.

Kirschenbaum, M. (2012). What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? En M. K. Gold, (Ed.), Debates in Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press.

Minayo, M. C. S. (2007). O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. HUCITEC.

Moura, M. A. (2019). Ciência da Informação e humanidades digitais: mediações, agência e compartilhamento de saberes. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 24, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/3893

Parra, H. Z. M. (2015). Ciência Cidadã: modos de participação e ativismo informacional. En S. Albagli, M. L. Maciel y A. H. Abdo (Orgs.), Ciência aberta, questões abertas (pp. 121-142). IBICT, UNIRIO. https://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/1060

Pimenta, R. M. (2016). Os objetos técnicos e seus papéis no horizonte das humanidades digitais: um caso para a ciência da informação. Revista Conhecimento em Ação, 1(2), 20-33. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rca/article/view/20

Rollo, M. F. (2020). Desafios e responsabilidades das humanidades digitais: preservar a memória, valorizar o patrimônio, promover e disseminar o conhecimento. O programa Memória para Todos. Estudos Históricos Rio de Janeiro, 33(69), 20-44. https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/80771

Secretaria de Educação Profissional e Tecnológica do Brasil. (2022). O “Aprender Fazendo” da Rede Federal de Educação Profissional Científica e Tecnológica: manual maker. MEC. https://www.ifpb.edu.br/sinergia/lampiao-maker/legislacao-1/manual-maker-v4-1.pdf

Shirk J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., Mccallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstien, B. V., Krasny, M. E. y Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229

Silva, F. C. C. y Silveira, L. (2019). O ecossistema da Ciência Aberta. Transinformação, 31, e190001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190001

Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R. y Wagenknecht, K. (2021). The Science of Citizen Science. Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4

Wiggins, A. y Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. IEEE http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207