Modelo colegial y rendimiento académico en la universidad pública española
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e160Palabras clave:
modelo colegial, rendimiento académico, universidad públicaResumen
Este artículo describe la extensión del modelo colegial en la universidad pública española y reúne evidencia de la influencia que este modelo de organización del trabajo académico ejerce sobre la intensidad y el rendimiento de dicho trabajo. Para ello se emplean datos procedentes de cuestionarios completados por 461 profesores universitarios de todas las universidades públicas españolas. El trabajo concluye que los rasgos del modelo colegial tienen una desigual presencia en la universidad española. En cuanto a la influencia de la organización colegial en el rendimiento académico, se concluye que los resultados son dependientes de las medidas de rendimiento que se empleen, así como de los rasgos del modelo colegial cuya influencia se valora.
Descargas
Referencias
Bakieva, M. (2016). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para evaluar la colegialidad docente [Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad de Valencia]. https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/mostrarRef.do?ref=1322205
Bakieva, M., Jornet Meliá, J. M., González-Such, J. y Leyva Barajas, Y. E. (2018). Colegialidad docente: evidencias de validación a partir del análisis realizado por comités de expertos acerca del instrumento para autoevaluación docente en España y México. Estudios sobre Educación, 34, 99-127. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.34.99-127
Bess, J.L. (1988). Collegiality and bureaucracy in the modern university. Teachers College Press.
Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work. The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, (127), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.152
Bland, C. J. y Ruffin, M. T. (1992). Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review. Academic Medicine, 67(6), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199206000-00010
Bobe, B. J. y Kober, R. (2020). University dean personal characteristics and use of management control systems and performance measures. Studies in Higher Education, 45(2), 235-257.
Burnes, B., Wend, P. y By, R. T. (2014). The changing face of English universities: reinventing collegiality for the twenty-first century. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 905-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.754858
Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership & management. Sage Publications.
Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, managerialism and leadership in English universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 1(2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354082
Dearlove, J. (1997). The academic labour process: From collegiality and professionalism to managerialism and proletarianisation? Higher Education Review, 30(1), 56-75.
Edgar, F. y Geare, A. (2013). Factors influencing university research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 774-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.601811
Filippakou, O. y Tapper, T. (2007). Quality assurance in higher education: Thinking beyond the English experience. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 339-360. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300155
Harman, H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Harris, G. y Kaine, G. (1994). The determinants of research performance: a study of Australian university economists. Higher Education, 27, 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384088
Jordan, P. J. y Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219871976
Kligyte, G. (2021). The logics of collegial practices: Australian and New Zealand/Aotearoa perspectives. Higher Education, 81(4), 843-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00580-9
Kligyte, G. y Barrie, S. (2014). Collegiality: Leading us into fantasy – the paradoxical resilience of collegiality in academic leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864613
Koskenranta, M., Kuivila, H., Pramila-Savukoski, S., Männistö, M. y Mikkonen, K. (2022). Development and testing of an instrument to measure the collegiality competence of social and health care educators. Nurse Education Today, 113, 105388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105388
Lortie, D. C. (1964). The teacher and team teaching. En J. Shaplin y H. Olds (Eds.), Team teaching. Harper & Row.
Macfarlane, B. (2016). Collegiality and performativity in a competitive academic culture. Higher Education Review, 48(2), 31-50.
McCarthy, D. y Dragouni, M. (2021). Managerialism in UK business schools: capturing the interactions between academic job characteristics, behaviour and the ‘metrics’ culture. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2338-2354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1723524
Miles, M.P., Shepherd, C.D., Rose, J.M. y Dibben, M. (2015). Collegiality in business schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3), 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2014-0022
Millet, J.D. (1962). The academic community: An essay on organization. McGraw-Hill.
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. (s.f.). Estadística de Personal de las Universidades: Personal docente e investigador (PDI total y en ETC). Recuperado el 10 de mayo de 2022 de https://estadisticas.universidades.gob.es/jaxiPx/Tabla.htm?path=/Universitaria/Personal/EPU22/PDI/PDI_TOTAL//l0/&file=PDI0301.px&type=pcaxis&L=0
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Prentice Hall.
Moreno Arellano, C. I. (2017). Las reformas en la educación superior pública en México: rupturas y continuidades. Revista de la Educación Superior, 46(182), 27-44.
Morris, L. (2005). Performance appraisals in Australian universities imposing a managerialistic framework into a collegial culture. En Reworking work: AIRAANZ 05: Proceedings of the 19th conference of the Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 387-394). Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30005581
Olaskoaga-Larrauri, J., González-Laskibar, X., Barrenetxea-Ayesta, M. y Díaz-De-Basurto-Uraga, P. (2019). The sign of the new millennium. Legal reforms, organisational changes and job satisfaction at Spanish public universities. European Journal of Education, 54(1), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12314
Olaskoaga-Larrauri, J., González-Laskibar, X. y Díaz-De-Basurto-Uraga, P. (2019). Spanish University Reforms and Job Satisfaction: Is There only One Way Out? Educational Policy, 33(2), 291-318.
Perera, C. J. (2015). Principal leadership practices and teacher collegiality in Malaysian high performing schools [Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad de Malasia]. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/id/eprint/5993
Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383729
Rhoades, G. y Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1) 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017973006062
Ryan, S. (2012). Academic zombies. A failure of resistance or a means of survival? Australian Universities’ Review, 54(2), 3-11.
Sarrico, C. S., Veiga, A. y Amaral, A. (2013). The long road-how evolving institutional governance mechanisms are changing the face of quality in Portuguese higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(4), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9174-x
Seigel, M. L. y Miner-Rubino, K. (2006). Some preliminary Statistical, Qualitative, and Anecdotal Findings of an Empirical Study of Collegiality among Law Professors. Widener Law Review, 13(1), 1-31. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/70
Seigel, M. L. y Miner-Rubino, K. (2009). Measuring the value of collegiality among law professors. Faulkner Law Review, 1, 257-287. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/76
Shah, M. (2011). The dimensionality of teacher collegiality and the development of teacher collegiality scale. International Journal of Education, 3(2), E10.
Shah, M. (2012). The impact of teachers’ collegiality on their organizational commitment in high- and low-achieving secondary schools in Islamabad, Pakistan. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(2), 130-156. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i2.1493
Shattock, M. (2013). University governance, leadership and management in a decade of diversification and uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12017
Smyth, J. (1991). International perspectives on teacher collegiality. A labour process discussion based on the concept of teachers’ work. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 12(3), 323-346.
Su, S. y Baird, K. (2017). The impact of collegiality amongst Australian accounting academics on work-related attitudes and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1049142
Su, S., Baird, K. y Tung, A. (2022). Controls and performance: assessing the mediating role of creativity and collegiality. Journal of Management Control, 33(4), 449-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-022-00344-9
Taberner, A. M. (2018). The marketisation of the English higher education sector and its impact on academic staff and the nature of their work. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(1), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2017-1198
Tapper, T. y Palfreyman, D. (2010). The collegial tradition in the age of mass higher education. Springer.
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Jon Olaskoaga-Larrauri, Sara Caro-García, Xabier González-Laskibar, Judith Ranilla-Arija

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista, no hagan uso comercial de ella y las obras derivadas de hagan bajo la misma licencia.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).























