Bilateralismo preponderante entre Estados Unidos y China durante 2019-2021

Sadcidi Zerpa de Hurtado; Alberto José Hurtado Briceño

doi:10.24215/23142766e154

Authors

Sadcidi Zerpa de Hurtado Universidad Católica de Córdoba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-1210
Alberto José Hurtado Briceño Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (UCC, sede Bogotá) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3660-8299

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/23142766e154

Keywords:

Preponderant bilateralism, China, United States, compensation, cooperation, competence

Abstract

From a comparative analysis perspective, neorealism and liberal institutionalism allow us to analyse variables related to power, interest, the role of institutions and international rules. This paper aims to analyse the preponderant bilateralism between the United States and China during the period 2019-2021. For such purpose, we will use the comparative and case study methods, as they contribute to the understanding of the preponderant US-China bilateralism. This allows thus us to infer that, in the areas of balance and diffusion of power, economic interdependence, and technological and digital interdependence, the prevailing US-China bilateralism moves between hybrid trade-offs and competitive cooperation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sadcidi Zerpa de Hurtado, Universidad Católica de Córdoba

Estudiante del Doctorado en Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, (Argentina). Estudiante del Doctorado en Ciencias Organizacionales, Universidad de Los Andes (Venezuela). Magister en Economía Política, mención Políticas Económicas, Universidad de Los Andes, (Venezuela). Investigadora GEEA, ULA. Fue profesora del Departamento de Economía en la Universidad de Los Andes.

Alberto José Hurtado Briceño, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (UCC, sede Bogotá)

Doctor en Ciencias Humanas, Universidad de Los Andes, (Venezuela). Magister en Economía, mención Políticas Económicas, Universidad de Los Andes, (Venezuela). Investigador asociado MinCiencia. Profesor Investigador del Programa de Comercio Internacional de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.

References

Actis, E. y Creus, N. (Eds., 2020). Estados Unidos – China y la disputa por el poder global. Capital Intelectual.

Blanco, J. (2014). “Pasos básicos en la modelación ecológica”. Revista Forestal Baracoa, 33 (Número Especial), 471-484.

Burns, N. (2020). Prefacio. En: Nye Jr. y Rice, C. (Comps.), The Struggle for power U.S.-China relations in the 21st century. The Aspen Institute.

Diamond, L. y Schell, O. (2018). Chinese influence & American interests. Promoting constructive vigilance. Stanford University, Hoover Institution Press.

Doshi, R. (2021). The long game. China´s grand strategy to displace American Orden. Oxford University Press.

Graham, A. (2020). The U.S.-China Strategic Competition: Clues from History. En Nye Jr. y Rice, C. (Comp.), The Struggle for power U.S.-China relations in the 21st century. The Aspen Institute.

Gil, T. (2021, 1 de febrero). Estados Unidos vs China: ¿puede la relación entre Pekín y Washington recuperarse tras cuatro años de Donald Trump? https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-55805132

Hurtado, A.J. y Zerpa de Hurtado, S. (2020). “China-Mercosur: impacto de los acuerdos swaps”. Cuadernos del CENDES, 37(104), 83-103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349844813_China-Mercosur_impacto_de_los_acuerdos_swaps

Liang, X y Xu, Y. (2020). Independent or interdependent innovation: The case of Huawei. En: Zhang, W; Alon, I y Lattermann, Ch. (Eds.), Huawei goes global. Volume I: Made in China for the world. Switzerland, Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47564-2

Manuel, A. Singh, P y Paine, T. (2020). Compete, contest, and collaborate: How to win the technology race with China. En Nye Jr. y Rice, C. (Comps.), The Struggle for power U.S.-China relations in the 21st century. The Aspen Institute.

Nye, Jr. J.S. (2020). The Rise of China. En Nye Jr. y Rice, C. (Comp.), The Struggle for power U.S.-China relations in the 21st century. The Aspen Institute.

Sartori, G. (1994). Compare Why and How: Comparing, Miscomparing and the Comparative Method. En: Dogan, Mattei and Ali Kazancigil (eds.), Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies and Substance, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, US: Blackwell.

Shambaugh, D. (2020). Toward a “Smart Competition” strategy for U.S. China policy. En Nye Jr. y Rice, C. (Comps.), The Struggle for power U.S.-China relations in the 21st century. The Aspen Institute.

Schell, O. Shirk, S. y Panda, A. (2019, 31 de julio). Reassessing U.S.-China Relations. Competition, confrontation, or collision course? A new report peers into the future of the world's most consequential bilateral relationship. https://www.carnegie.org/our-work/article/competition-confrontation-or-collision-course-reassessing-us-china-relations/

Piovani, J.I. y Krawczyk, N. (2017). Los Estudios Comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas, Educação & Realidade, 42 (3), 821-840, Julio- Septiembre. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-623667609

Vogelmann, J. (2021). Ascending China and the Hegemonic United States. Economically based cooperation or strategic power politics? Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31660-0

Xuetong, Y. (2020). Bipolar Rivalry in the Early Digital Age, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, pp. 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaa007