A contribuição de Bourdieu para a ciência e os objetos das Relações Internacionais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23142766e087Keywords:
Pierre Bourdieu, International Relations, Sociology of Knowledge, International AffairsAbstract
The paper questions the still incipient role of Pierre Bourdieu's sociology in understanding the objects analyzed in the field of International Relations as well as his critical understanding as a specific social field. The central argument of the article is divided into two parts. First, it points to contributions from the sociology of the fields to a critical historiography of the formation of the scientific field of International Relations. Second, it demonstrates how the notions of Bourdieu can appropriate the objects of the field, the phenomena about the “international”. In addition to a literature review of part of Bourdieu's work, a bibliographical analysis of the works of internationalist authors is carried out with the aim of contributing to the theoretical debates in the field.
Downloads
References
Adkins, L. and Skeggs, B. (eds). (2005). Feminists After Bourdieu, Oxford: Blackwell.
Adler-Nissen, R. (2012a). Sovereignty. In R. Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 179-192). London/New-York: Routledge.
Adler-Nissen, R. (2012b). Introduction. In R. (. Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 1-23). London/New-York: Routledge.
Agnew, J. (2007). Know-where: geographies of knowlegde of wolrd politics. International Political Sociology, 1, pp. 138-148.
Anderson, Benedict R. (2008). Comunidades imaginadas: reflexões sobre a origem e a difusão do nacionalismo. São Paulo: Companhia das letras, 2008.
Ashworth, L. (2014). A History of International Thought: From the origins of the modern state to academic international relations. New York: Routledge
Bell, D. (2009). Writing the world: disciplinary history and beyond. International Affairs, 85(1), pp. 3-22.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Berlin, T. V. (2012). Knowlegdes. In R. Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 59-77). London/New York: Routledge.
Bigo, D. (2013). Security. In Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 114-130). New York/London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Soc. Sci. Infor, 6, pp. 19-47.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination, Cambridge: Polity;
Bourdieu, P. (2002a). Algunas propriedades de los campos. In P. Bourdieu, Campo de poder, campo intelectual: itinerário de un concepto' (pp. 119-125). Editorial Montressor.
Bourdieu, P. (2002b). Campo de Poder, Campo Intelectual: Itinerario de un concepto. Editorial Montressor.
Bourdieu, P. (2002c). Campo intelectual y proyecto criador. In P. Bourdieu, Campo de poder, campo intelectual: itinerário de un concepto' (pp. 9-50). Editorial Montressor.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). El oficio de científico: ciencia de la ciencia y reflexividad. Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama S.A.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
Breitenbauch, H. O. & Wivel, A. (2004). Understanding national IR discipline outside the United States: political culture and the construction if International Relations in Denmark. JIRD, 7, pp. 414-443.
Breuning, M., Bredehoft, J. & Walton, E. (2005). Promise and Performance: An Evaluation of Journals in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives, 6, pp. 447-461
Bueger, C. (2012). From epistemology to practice: a sociologia of Science for IR. JIRD, 15, 97-109.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: Na Agenda For Security Studies in the Post-Cold War. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Estados Unidos.
Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2009). ‘Macrosecuritisation and Security Constellations: Reconsidering Scale in Securitisation Theory’, Review of International Studies, 35(2): 253–276.
Carvalho, B., Leira, H., & Hobson, J. (march de 2011). The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You About 1648 and 1919. Millenium, 39, 735-758.
Carr, Edward. (1946 [1939]). The twenty years’ crisis: 1919-1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. London: MacMillan Press.
Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cohen, A. (2018). Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations. In M. Thomas, & J. J. Sallaz, The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 202-245). Oxford University Press.
Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 10, n. 2, p. , 1981., 10(2), 136-155.
Crane, D. (1967, Nov.), The Gatekeepers of Science: Some Factors Affecting the Selection of Articles for Scientific Journals. The American Scologist, 2(4), 195-201.
Deciancio, M. (2016, julio-diciembre). La Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en la historia del campo de las Relaciones Internacionales argentinas. Revista de Historia del Derecho(52), pp. 31-63.
Deciancio, M. (2017). La construcción del campo de las Relaciones Internacionales argentinas: contribuciones desde la Geopolítica. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, 12(2), pp. 179-205.
Deciancio, M. (julio-diciembre de 2016). La Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en la historia del campo de las Relaciones Internacionales argentinas. Revista de Historia del Derecho(52), págs. 31-63.
Deutsch, K. W. (1957). Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Duroselle, Jean-Baptiste. (2000). Capítulo 1: O estrangeiro. In Duroselle, Jean-Baptiste,Todo império perecerá. Teoria das relações internacionais. Tradução de Ane Lize Spaltemberg de Seiqueira Magalhães, Brasília: Edunb, 2000; 483 p. Coleção Relações Internacionais.
Epstein, C. (2013). Norms. In R. Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 165-179). New York/London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1999). As palavras e as coisas: uma arqueologia das ciências humanas (8ª ed.). São Paulo: Martin Fontes.
Foucault, M. (2008), A arqueologia do saber (7ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.
Fraser, N. (1995). Pragmatism, Feminism, and the Linguistic Turn’, in Benhabib, S. et al. (eds.) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange, New York: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice Interruptus: Critical Refl ection on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, New York: Routledge.
Freire, L. G. (2013). The potential and the pitfalls of metatheory in IR. Estudos Internacionais, 1(2).
Guilhot, N. (2011). The realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory. In N. (. Guilhot, The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference of Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Haas, E. (1958). The Uniting of Europe, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hagmann, J. & Biersteker, T. J. (2012). Beoynd the published discipline: Toward a critical pedagogy of international studies. EJIR, pp. 1-25.
Hoffman, S. (1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus, 106, n. 3, summer 1977, pp. 41-60.
Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inayatullah, N. & Blaney, D. L. (2004). International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge
Jackson, P. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu, the “Cultural Turn” and the practice of international history. Review of International Studies, 24(1), pp. 155-1881.
Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996). The Culture of National Security, New York: Columbia University Press.
Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kreimer, P. (1993, diciembre). Publicar y castigar. El paper como problema y la dinámica de los campos científicos. Redes, V(12), pp. 51-73.
Kristensen, P. (2013). Revisiting the "American Social Science" - Mapping the Geography of International Relations. International Studies Perspective, pp. 1-24.
Kuhn, T. (1998). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
Kurki, M., & Wight, C. (2013). International Relations and Social Science. In T. Dunne, M.
Kurky, & S. Smith, International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 14-35). UK: Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: on the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), pp. 235-254.
Laudan, L. (1978). Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Leander, A. (2006). The ‘Realpolitik of Reason’: Thinking International Relations through Fields, Habitus and Practice. University of Southern Denmark, Department of Intercultural Communication and Management. Copenhagen Business School.
Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul Ltd.
Mérand, F. & Forget, A. (2013). Strategy. In R. Adler-Nisser, Bourdieu in International Relations Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 93-114). New York/London: Routledge.
Morgenthau, H. ([1948] 1956). Politics Among Nations, 2nd edn, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Onuf, Nicholas G. (1989) The World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Parmar, I. (2011). American Hgemony, the Rockefeller Foudantion, and the Rise of Academic International relations in the United States. In N. Guilhot, The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference of Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Popper, K. (1993). A lógica da pesquisa científica. São Paulo: Cultrix.
Pouliot, V. (2010). International Security in Practice. The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pouliot, V., & Mérand, F. (2012). Bourdieu's concepts. In R. Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 24-44). London/New York: Routleged.
Ruggie, J. G. (1983). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. In Stephen D. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes, pp. 195-232. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
Sarlo, B. (1992). Intelectuales y revistas: razones de una práctica. América: Cahiers du CRICCAL(9-10), pp. 9-16.
Sarthou, N. F. (2011). El campo científico y las revistas: el campo de Relaciones Internacionales en Argentina y la Revista Desarrollo Económico (Tesis de Maestría). (D. d. Taborga, Ed.) Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Humanidades. Maestría en Estudios Latinoamericanos. Retrieved from Disponible en el Repositorio Institucional de la UNSAM (TMAG ESHUM 2011 SNF)
Sarthou, N. (Jul-dez de 2012). Las revistas científicas de Ciencias Sociales: un acercamiento a la legitimación en el campo científico de las relaciones internacionales en Argentina (1958-1990). Revista Brasileira de História da Ciência, 5(2), págs. 296-314.
Schelling, T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmidt, B. C. (1998). The political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of International Relations. Albany: Suny.
Singer, D.J. (1961). ‘The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations’. World Politics 14(1): 77–92.
Smith, S. (2002). The United States and the discipline of International Relations: "hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline". International Studies Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, International Relations and the New Inequality (Summer, 2002), pp. 67-85.
Targa, L. G. (2017). Elementos para uma Sociologia das Relações Internacionais: o campo dos diplomatas e o Estado como metacampo. PLURAL, 2, pp. 65-85.
Tickner, A. B. (2002). Los estudios internacionales en América latina: ?subordinación o pensamiento emancipatorio? (C. D. Universidade de los Andes, Ed.) Bogotá: Alfaomega Colombiana.
Tickner, A. B. & Waever, O. (2009). International Relations Scholarship around the world. Routledge.
Tickner, A. B. (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations. EJIR, 19(3), págs. 627-646.
Turton, H. L. (2016). International relations and American dominance: a diverse discipline. New York: Routledge.
Wæver, O. (1998, september), The sociology of a not so international discipline. International Organization, 52(04), pp. 687-727.
Walker, R.B.J. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of International Politics. Waveland Press.
Weber, M. (1997), Sociologia. São Paulo: Editora Ática.
Weber, M. (2004). Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva. 3 ed. Brasília: São Paulo: Ed. UnB; Imprensa Oficial, 2004.
Wendt, A. (1987). ‘The Agent–Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’. International Organization, 41(3): 335–370.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2): 391–425.
Wendt, A. (2014). Teoria Social da Política Internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Apicuri.
Wight, C. (2006). Agents and Structures in International Relations Theory: Politics as Ontology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wight, Martin. (1985). A política de poder. Tradução Carlos Sergio Duarte. Brasília, DF: Ed. UnB.
Williams, M. C. (2013). Culture. In R. Adler-Nissen, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 131-147). New York/Lond: Routledge.
Yoels, W. C. (1974, Spring). The Struture of Scientific Fields and the Allocation of Editorships on Scientific Journals: Some Observations on the Politics of Knowledge. The Sociological Quarterly, 15(2), 264-276
Zehfuss, M. (2001). Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations, Volume: 7 issue: 3, page(s): 315-348
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra. A partir de noviembre del 2020 los artículos se publicarán en la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución- NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Acorde a estos términos, el material se puede compartir (copiar y redistribuir en cualquier medio o formato) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material otra obra), siempre que a) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista y URL de la obra), b) no se use para fines comerciales y c) se mantengan los mismos términos de la licencia.
Previo a esta fecha los artículos se publicaron en la revista bajo una Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (BY-SA 2.5). - Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
