Panorama actual de los criptotribunales arbitrales: obstáculos y consideraciones jurídicas

Wendolyne Nava González; Nuria González Martín

doi:10.24215/25916386e133

Authors

Wendolyne Nava González Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
Nuria González Martín Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-0772

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/25916386e133

Keywords:

blockchain, crypto courts, alternative dispute resolution, Kleros

Abstract

The ecosystem of new technologies that has developed in recent years has brought with it disruptive innovations that are drastically transforming law and, specifically, international arbitration. The creation of crypto arbitral courts that operate on a public blockchain is a controversial idea that generates discussion between the academic community and legal operators. However, under the principle of party autonomy, this type of arbitration is a reality that cannot be ignored. The objective of this work was to analyze the legal scope of this new way of resolving conflicts, taking the Kleros platform as a case study. It is concluded that despite the various challenges faced by crypto arbitral tribunals, they change the paradigm of administration of justice today, which adapts to this new digital age, resolving conflicts that by their nature are very unlikely to come to fruition. courts such as those related to e-sports or the metaverse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Wendolyne Nava González, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

Research Professor, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (UACJ), Mexico. D. in Law, specializing in private international law, University of Barcelona with distinction summa cum laude. Post-doctorate in Law and New Technologies at Mediterranea International Centre for Human Rights Research, Reggio Calabria, Italy. Member of the Mexican National System of Researchers, Level 1. Editor of the Revista Especializada en Investigación Jurídica.

Nuria González Martín, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

D. in Law from the University of Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain. Researcher C, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (IIJ-UNAM). Post-doctorate in Law and New Technologies, Mediterranea International Centre for Human Rights Research, Reggio Calabria, Italy. Researcher of the National System of Researchers, Level III. Ad honorem External Advisor to the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz Award 2020.

References

Asociación Española de Video Juegos (2017). Libro blanco de los esport en España. http://www.aevi.org.es/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ES_libroblanco_online.pdf

Asociación Española de Video Juegos (2020). La industria del videojuego en españa. Anuario 2020. http://www.aevi.org.es/web/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/AEVI_Anuario_2020.pdf

Ast, F. (2021). Webinar Internacional: Kleros justicia descentralizada y tecnología blockchain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N96wsh7yfII [Video].

Banco Central Europeo (2019) Crypto-Assets. Trends and Implications. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/intro/mip-online/2019/html/1906_crypto_assets.en.html

Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White book, (3)37.

https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf

CNUDMI (2006). Ley Modelo de la CNUDMI sobre Arbitraje Comercial Internacional. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/es/07-87001_ebook.pdf

De Trazegnies, F. (1996). Arbitraje de Derecho y Arbitraje de Conciencia. Ius et veritas, (12) (pp. 115-124).

Dilag, M. y Smith, H. (2021). From cryptocurrencies to crypto courts: blockchain and the financialization of dispute resolution platforms. Information, Communication and Society.https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1942958

Katsh, E. y Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017) Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. Oxford Scholarship Online.

Kleros (2022). Acerca de Kleros. http://kleros.io/es/about/

Law Commission (2021). Smart legal contracts. Advice to Government. HH Associates Ltd. On behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty´s Stationary Office, UK.

Lew, J. (2005). Is Arbitration Autonomous. Arbitration International, 22(2) (pp. 179-182).

Michaels, R. (2021). Achieving the Dream: Autonomous Arbitration. The Cambridge Companion to International Arbitration.

Molina, D. (2020). ¿Las Nuevas Tecnologíss Extinguirán El Sistema Arbitral? Kleros: Una Mirada Al Futuro Del Arbitraje Internacional. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/09/30/las-nuevas-tecnologias-extinguiran-el-sistema-arbitral-kleros-una-mirada-al-futuro-del-arbitraje-internacional/

Montero, A. (2020). Breves consideraciones sobre el arbitraje en equidad. Avani, No. 1 (pp. 435-452).

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. www.bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper

Pombo, V. (2021) ¿Qué diferencia hay entre un token y una criptomoneda? https://www.bbva.com/es/que-diferencias-hay-entre-un-token-y-una-criptomoneda/

Silva, J. (1991). Arbitraje comercial internacional Mexicano. Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.

Sevilla, A. (2016). Teoría de juegos. https://economipedia.com/definiciones/teoria-de-juegos.html

Tapia, A. (2020). Decálogo de la nueva regulación europea del crowfunding. Diario La Ley, N. 9730.

Tenorio, A y Martín, A. (2015). Un paseo por la historia de la Teoría de Juegos. Boletín de Matemáticas, 22(1) (pp. 77-95).

Veciño, S. (2021). Cuestiones Jurídicas sobre los e-sports y los jugadores profesionales de videojuegos. Tesis de Doctorado, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Da Coruña.

Vijayan, S. (2022). Autonomous Arbitration in the Era of the Metaverse. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/03/11/autonomous-arbitration-in-the-era-of-the-metaverse/

Von Neumann, J y Morgestern, O (1944). The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.

Yaga, D., P. Mell, N. Roby y K. Scarfone (2018). Blockchain Technology Overview. NISTIR 8202 (DRAFT). NIST. https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8202/draft