Porcine behavior study: an ethological view on swine production

Authors

  • Paula Arroyo IGEVET
  • Hector Ricardo Ferrari
  • Alicia Graciela Antonini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e022

Keywords:

pig production, ethology, animal welfare

Abstract

The comprehension of behavior allows to improve the animal handling used in production and optimize their welfare. The discipline of the biological sciences that addresses this issue is ethology. Based on the theory of evolution, it emphasizes four types of explanations, known as the “four questions of Tinbergen”. Are these four approaches useful for the applicated ethology in swine production? Can research on ethology contribute to better breeding conditions? Fundamentally, are they relevant for animal’s welfare? Today, some practices performed in an “intuitive” or “empirical” way can be identified as “the silent help” in which ethology has contributed in each productive stage since the beginning of the use of the domestic animals breeding, particularly when it turns into an intensive manner. This silent help generated a combination of specific knowledge which paradoxically do not relate with this discipline. It is proposed here by giving the voice to this help, identifying the different ethologist developments in swine production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alcock J. Proximate and ultimate causes of behavior: how and why birds sing. En: 2001. Animal behavior. An evolutionary approach. (7a ed). Massachusetts. Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 23­49.

Albiach­Serrano A, Bräuer J, Cacchione T, Zickert N, Amici F. 2012. The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica). Applied Animal Behavior Science. 141:25­35. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.07.005

Baxter MR. 1983. Ethology in environmental design for animal production. Applied Animal Ethology. 9:207­20. doi: 10.1016/0304­3762(83)90001­9

Benson G, Rollin, B. Theoretical framework. En: 2004. The well being of farm animal, challenges and solutions. First edition. Blackwell Publishing. EE.UU, pp. 3­179.

Broom DM. 1991. Animal welfare: Concept and measurement. Journal of Animal Science. 69:4167­75.

Capitelli GM, Ferrari HR, López H. 2010. Introducción a la medicina veterinaria Darwiniana. Aplicaciones de la teoría de la evolución en la práctica veterinaria. Vaccinología, zoonosis y bienestar animal como ejemplos de aplicación. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria (Buenos Aires). 91:(5/6)71­5.

Curio E. 1994. Causal and functional questions: how are they linked? Animal Behaviour. 47:999­1021. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1994.1139

Dewsbury DA. 1999. The proximate and the ultimate: past, present, and future. Behavioural Processes. 46:189­99.

Dostalkova W, Spinkaz M, Kindlmann P. 2002. Begging for milk: evolution of teat massaging in suckling pigs. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 215:321­32. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2511

Duncan IJ. 1995. DGM Wood­Gush Memorial Lecture: An applied ethologist looks at the question “Why?”. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 44(2­4):205­17. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(95)00614­X

Finlay B, Hinz F, Darlington R. 2011. Mapping behavioral evolution onto brain evolution: the strategic roles of conserved organization in individuals and species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 366:2111­23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0344

Fraser D, Krames DL, Pajor EA, Weary DM. 1995. Conflict and cooperation: sociobiological principles and the behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 44:139­57. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(95)00610­5

Fraser D, Rushen J. 1992. Calostrum intake by newborn pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Sciences. 1­13. doi: 10.4141/cjas92­001

Fraser D, Thompson BK. 1991. Armed sibling rivalry among suckling piglets. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 29:9­15.

Grandin T. 1980. Livestock behavior as related to handling facility design. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems. 1:33­52.

Hartsock TG, Graves HB. 1976. Neonatal behavior and nutrition­related mortality in domestic swine. Journal of Animal Science. 42(1):235­41.

Hogan JA. 2015. A framework for the study of behavior. Behavioral Processes. 117:105­13. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.05.003

Hohenshell LM, Minick JA, Lay Jr DC, Ford SP. 1996. Maternal behavior potentially affecting offspring survivability: a comparison between Meishan and Yorkshire X Landrace (YL) sows. Swine Research Report. IOWA State University. Disponible en: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/swinereports [Consultado 01/01/2017].

Hoy JM, Murray PJ, Tribe A. 2010. Thirty years later: enrichment practices for captive mammals. Zoo Biology 29:303­16. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20254

Hughes B, Duncan I. 1988. The notion of ethological 'need', models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behavior. 36:1696­707. doi: 10.1016/S0003­3472(88)80110­6

Illman G, Pokorná Z, Spinka M. 2007. Allosuckling in domestic pigs: teat acquisition strategy and consequences. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 106:26­38. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.06.012

Jensen P. 1986. Observation of maternal behaviour of free­ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 16:131­42. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(86)90105­X

Jensen P. 1993. Nest building in domestic sows: the sole of external estimuli. Animal Behavior. 45(2):351­8.

Jensen, P. Comportamiento del cerdo. 2004. Etología de los animales domésticos. Zaragoza, España. Jensen (Editor), Editorial Acribia, pp. 168­84.

Jensen P, Toates F. 1993. Who needs 'behavioural needs'? Motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 37:161­81. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(93)90108­2

Lakatos I. 1983."La metodología de los programas de investigación científica". Madrid. Alianza Editorial.

Larson G. 2005. Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication. Science. 307:1618. doi: 10.1126/science.1106927

Lorenz K. 1937. The companion in the bird’s world. The Auk. 54:245­73.

Lorenz K. 1974. Etología comparada. El comportamiento instintivo en la filogenia. En: Biología del comportamiento. Ciudad de México; Siglo XXI Editores, pp. 7­18.

Lorenz, Konrad. 1995. La otra cara del espejo. Plaza & Janes.

Meunier­Salaün MC, Gort F, Prunier A, Schouten WPG. 1991. Behavioral patterns and progesterone, cortisol and prolactin levels around parturition in European (Large White) and Chinese (Meishan) sows. Applied Animal Behavior. Science. 31:43­59. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(91)90152­N

Orihuela A, Solano JJ. 1995. Managing "teat order" in suckling pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). Applied Animal Behavior Science. 46:125­30. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(95)00639­7

Redivatti M. 2009. Caracterización de cerdos criollos del nordeste argentino. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Córdoba, España.

Skinner B. 1974. Sobre el conductismo. Título del original: About behaviourism. Publicado por Alfred A Knopf, New York. USA· Traducción Fernando Barrera. Ed Planeta­De Agostini Mexico DF.

Spinka M, Algers B. 1995. Functional view on udder massage after milk let­down in pigs. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 43:197­212. doi: 10.1016/0168­1591(95)00560­F

Stamps J. 2003. Behavioral processes affecting development: Tinbergen's fourth question comes of age. Animal Behavior. 66(1):1­13. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2180

Tinbergen N. 1939. On the analysis of social organization among vertebrates, with special references to birds. The American Naturalist. 21:210­34.

Tinbergen N. 1963. “On aims and methods of ethology.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 20:410­33.

Tinbergen N. 1981. El estudio del instinto. 10° edición. Ciudad de México; Siglo XXI editores.

Thorpe WH. 1965. The assessmentt of pain and distress in animals. En: Report of the Technical Committee to enquire into de welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock systems (F.W.R. Brambell). HMSO, London. UK.

Thorpe WH. 1982. Breve historia de la etología. Vol 902. Madrid, España; Alianza Editorial.

Wiepkema PR. Behavioral aspects of stress. En: 1987. Wiepkema PR; van Adrichem PWM (Editors). Biology of stress in farm animals: an integrative approach. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht. 113­33.

Published

2018-06-21

How to Cite

Arroyo, P., Ferrari, H. R., & Antonini, A. G. (2018). Porcine behavior study: an ethological view on swine production. Analecta Veterinary, 38(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e022

Issue

Section

Review articles