Liquid culture medium for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Usefulness and comparative analysis with Herrold medium: preliminary results

Authors

  • Magali Andrea Romero Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias
  • María Fiorella Alvarado Pinedo Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias
  • Luis Maria Peralta Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias
  • Pedro Sebastián Sosa Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias
  • Roberto Damián Moyano Instituto Nacional de Tecnología agropecuaria (INTA), laboratorio de biotecnología. Castelar.
  • Maria de la Paz Santangelo Instituto Nacional de Tecnología agropecuaria (INTA), laboratorio de biotecnología. Castelar.
  • Gabriel Eduardo Travería Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e025

Keywords:

Mycobacterium, liquid culture medium, Ziehl-Neelsen, mycobactin

Abstract

Paratuberculosis is a chronical disease caused by acidfast bacilli (AFB) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map). There is neither an effective treatment nor any vaccine approved by the sanitary authority (SENASA) in Argentina. Diagnosis and segregation of positive animals are essential for the control of the disease. For the diagnosis of cattle paratuberculosis, a modified Middlebrook M7H9 broth medium was developed. To test the effectiveness of the medium, fecal and tissue samples were cultured in Herrold with mycobactin and liquid culture media, and time to growth was compared by direct observation of colonies and microscopic grouped AFB observation, respectively. Significant differences were observed between liquid tested and Herrold media, both in time to grow and in the number of positive animals detected. Based on these results, it is concluded that liquid medium offers greater analytical sensitivity and faster detection than Herrold medium.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Andrews AH. 2004. Bovine medicine: diseases and husbandry of cattle. 2° Ed. Reimp. Reino Unido, Blackwell Publishing Company.

Collins DM, Stephens DM, de Lisle GW. 1993. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction tests and faecal culture for detecting Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine faeces. Veterinary Microbiology. 36(3­4):288­99.

Collins, MT. 1996. Diagnosis of paratuberculosis. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 12(2):357­71.

Merkal RS, Curran BJ. 1974. Growth and metabolic characteristics of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Applied Microbiology. 28:276­9.

Morsella C, Paolicchi F. 2008. Aplicación de métodos de diagnóstico y control de paratuberculosis en Argentina. XXI Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias. Guadalajara, México, pp. 37­43.

Motiwala AS, Strother M, Theus NE, Stich RW, Byrum B, Shulaw WP, Kapur V, Sreevatsan S. 2005. Rapid detection and typing of strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from broth cultures. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 43(5):2111­7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2111­2117.2005

Pozzato N, Gwozdz J, Gastaldelli M, Capello K, Ben CD, Stefani E. 2011. Evaluation of a rapid and inexpensive liquid culture system for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine faeces. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 84(3):413­7. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.01.019

Shin SJ, Han JH, Manning EJ, Collins MT. 2007. Rapid and reliable method for quantification of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by use of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 45(6):1941­8. doi:10.1128/JCM.02616­06

Soto JP, Kruze J, Leiva S. 2002. Aislamiento de Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis de fecas en rebaños lecheros infectados mediante el método de Cornell modificado. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 34(2):275­82. doi: 10.4067/S0301­732X2002000200013

Stabel JR. 1997. An improved method for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples and comparison to three other methods. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 9(4) 375­80.

Whipple DL, Callihan DR, Jarnagin JL. 1991. Cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal specimens and a suggested standardized procedure. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 3(4):368­73. doi: 10.1177/104063879100300424

Whittington RJ. 2009. Factors affecting isolation and identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from fecal and tissue samples in a liquid culture system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 47(3):614­22. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01986­08

Whittington RJ, Whittington AM, Waldron A, Begg DJ, De Silva K, Purdie AC, Plain KM. 2013. Development and validation of a liquid medium (M7H9C) for routine culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis to replace modified Bactec 12B medium. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 51(12):3993­4000. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01373­13

Published

2018-06-22

How to Cite

Romero, M. A., Alvarado Pinedo, M. F., Peralta, L. M., Sosa, P. S., Moyano, R. D., Santangelo, M. de la P., & Travería, G. E. (2018). Liquid culture medium for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Usefulness and comparative analysis with Herrold medium: preliminary results. Analecta Veterinary, 38(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e025

Issue

Section

Technical reports

Most read articles by the same author(s)