Yolk:albumen ratio in eggs from laying hens of three genotypes for semi-intensive systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e064

Keywords:

nonlinear regression, dynamic behaviour, Brody function, exponential decay model, free-range hens

Abstract

The dynamic behaviour of the yolk: albumen ratio was studied in eggs from hens of the three-way cross Campero Casilda compared to Negra INTA and Rhode Island Red. Eggs (n=15) were randomly collected from each genetic group every four weeks between 26 and 70 weeks of age. The proportions of yolk and albumen and the relationship between them were calculated. Yolk proportion and yolk albumen ratio data as a function of age were adjusted with the Brody function and albumen proportion with analyzed using an exponential decay model. Campero Casilda eggs showed a similar proportion of yolk to Negra INTA at the beginning and a higher one at the end of the productive cycle. Rhode Island Red presented the lowest proportion of yolk, the highest proportion of albumen and the lowest yolk: albumen ratio. The lowest albumen proportion and the highest yolk albumen ratio corresponded to Campero Casilda while Negra INTA showed intermediate values of both traits. The higher content of total solids in Campero Casilda eggs constitutes a comparative advantage in terms of nutritional value, a relevant feature when considering the human population with unsatisfied basic needs to which this genotype is particularly destined.

Downloads

Metrics

Visualizaciones del PDF
198
Aug 07 '22Aug 10 '22Aug 13 '22Aug 16 '22Aug 19 '22Aug 22 '22Aug 25 '22Aug 28 '22Aug 31 '22Sep 01 '22Sep 04 '223.0
| |
Visualizaciones del HTML
132
Aug 07 '22Aug 10 '22Aug 13 '22Aug 16 '22Aug 19 '22Aug 22 '22Aug 25 '22Aug 28 '22Aug 31 '22Sep 01 '22Sep 04 '222.0
| |
Visualizaciones de otros formatos
77
Aug 07 '22Aug 10 '22Aug 13 '22Aug 16 '22Aug 19 '22Aug 22 '22Aug 25 '22Aug 28 '22Aug 31 '22Sep 01 '22Sep 04 '222.0
| |

Author Biographies

Bernardo Martin Romera, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Cátedra de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. Becario del Programa Estratégico de Formación de Recursos Humanos en Investigación y Desarrollo (PERHID), Argentina.

Cristian Hernán Perrotta, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Cátedra de Aves y Pilíferos, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Juan Pablo Savoy, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Cátedra de Aves y Pilíferos, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Alejandra Edith Antruejo, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Cátedra de Aves y Pilíferos, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Zulma Edith Canet, Universidad Nacional de Rosario - INTA

Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Ana María Dottavio, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Cátedra de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Ricardo José Di Masso, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Cátedra de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

References

Bendezu HCP; Sakomura, NK, Malheiros EB, Gous RM, Ferreira NT, Fernandes JBK. 2018. Modelling the egg components and internal cycle length of laying hens. Animal Production Science. 59(3):420-26. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17215

Bonino M. 1997. Pollo Campero. Protocolo para la certificación. INTA Pergamino.

Dottavio AM, Canet ZE, Faletti C, Álvarez M, Font MT, Di Masso RJ. 2005. Yolk:albumen ratio in experimental hybrid layers with different paternal genotype. Archivos de Zootecnia. 54(205):87-95.

Drewnowski A. 2010. The nutrient rich foods index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 91(4):1095s-101s. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D

Ferreira NT, Sakomura, NK, de Paula Dorigam JC, Pereira da Silva E, Gous RM. 2015. Modelling the egg components and laying patterns of broiler breeder hens. Animal Production Science. 56(7):1091-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14737

Harms RH, Hussein SM. 1993. Variations in yolk albumen ratio in hen eggs from commercial flocks. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2(2):166-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/2.2.166

Hartmann C, Johansson K, Strandberg E, Wilhelmson M. 2000. One-generation divergent selection on large and small yolk proportions in a White Leghorn line. British Poultry Science. 41(3):280-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/713654930

Icken W, Looft C, Schellander K, Cavero D, Blanco A, Schmutz M, Preisinger R. 2014. Implications of genetic selection on yolk proportion on the dry matter content of eggs in a White Leghorn population. British Poultry Science. 55(3):291-7.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.917272

Mine Y, Kovacs-Nolan J. 2004. Biologically active hen components in human health and disease. The Journal of Poultry Science. 41(1):1-29. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.41.1

Nys Y, Sauveur B. 2004. Valeur nutritionnelle des œufs. INRAE Productions Animales. 17(5):385-93.

Réhault-Godbert S, Guyot N, Nys Y. 2019. The golden egg: nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients. 1(3):684. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030684

Romera BM, Martines A, Advínculo SA, Fernández R, Librera JE, Canet ZE, Dottavio AM, Di Masso R.J. 2020. Curva de postura de gallinas Campero Casilda de primer ciclo. Revista FAVUNRC Ab Intus. 6(3):36-46.

Shafer DJ, Carey JB, Prochaska JF, Sams AR. 1998. Dietary methionine intake effects on egg component yield, composition, functionality, and texture profile analysis. Poultry Science.77(7):1056-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.7.1056

Zhu W, Zhang J, He K, Geng Z, Chen X. 2020. Proteomic analysis of fertilized egg yolk proteins during embryonic development. Poultry Science. 99(5):2775-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.056

Zuk YO, Park C. 2001. Effect of breed and age of hens on the yolk to albumen ratio in two different genetic stocks. Poultry Science. 80(7):855-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.7.855

Published

2022-08-06

How to Cite

Romera, B. M., Perrotta, C. H., Savoy, J. P., Antruejo, A. E., Canet, Z. E., Dottavio, . A. M., & Di Masso, R. J. (2022). Yolk:albumen ratio in eggs from laying hens of three genotypes for semi-intensive systems. Analecta Veterinary, 42(1), 064. https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e064

Issue

Section

Short Communications

Most read articles by the same author(s)