Prácticas ecosóficas, semiocapitalismo y mediamutación: ‘por qué decimos algo y no más bien nada’

Authors

  • Camilo Ríos CONICET

Keywords:

Ecosophy, Semiocapitalism, Mediamutation, Media

Abstract

Following Sibilia, faustic and promethean postures divide the opinion regarding the relation between media, social link digitalization and new generations. I will overview that field to suggest a dialogue between three almost secondary thinkers. Even though there are some bibliographical and biographical links among some of them, they’re not usually called to discuss about this also because it’s not their main investigation topic. I refer to Peter Sloterdijk, Félix Guattari and ‘Bifo’. The goal of this dialogue –that includes Sibilia, Fukuyama and others in a second line– is, on the one hand, review some concepts that help us thinking the issue deflecting the two main postures above marked; and on the other hand, remark their power in terms of a current ethical and political diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Camilo Ríos, CONICET

Sociólogo (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Magister en Sociología de la Cultura y Análisis Cultural (IDAES-UNSAM). Becario doctoral (CONICET). Estudiante del Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales (UBA).

Published

2019-07-08

How to Cite

Camilo Ríos. (2019). Prácticas ecosóficas, semiocapitalismo y mediamutación: ‘por qué decimos algo y no más bien nada’. Hipertextos, 4(6), 124–142. Retrieved from https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/hipertextos/article/view/7748

Issue

Section

Artículos