As mascotes no Sistema Familiar. Legitimidade, Formação e dinâmicas das famílias humano-animal.

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe036

Palavras-chave:

animal de companhia, dinâmica familiar, família, pets, teoria sistêmica

Resumo

Ainda que o mascote segurado tenha se intensificado, não se trata de um fenômeno do pós-humanismo, senão que provem da pré-história. Os recentes aumentos nesta prática parecem depender de uma mudança geral de atitude para com os animais. Atualmente, as mascotes aparecem como uma característica onipresente na vida familiar ocidental, e a Teoria Sistêmica resulta em uma destacada perspectiva para seu estudo. Converter animais em família implica um processo bidirecional onde este tem um rol ativo. As mascotes desempenham funções compartilhadas e particulares, adequando-se as demandas de cada etapa familiar y contribuindo as duas funções básicas das famílias: manter a coesão favorecendo o desenvolvimento. Os animais têm também um rol estabilizante e dinâmico, sendo particularmente importantes durante as crises, e podendo desestabilizar o sistema ao ausentar-se. Finalmente, é fornecida recomendações para que os clínicos possam incluir as mascotes no trabalho com famílias multiespécies.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Biografia do Autor

Marcos Díaz Videla, Universidad de Flores. Laboratorio de Investigación en Antrozoología de Buenos Aires (LIABA)

Dr. en psicología, formado en Universidad de Buenos Aires, Fundación Gregory Bateson, Escuela Sistémica Argentina y Universidad de Flores, donde actualmente es docente de terapia familiar y psicopatología. Obtuvo su PhD a través de su investigación sobre interacciones humano-animal, habiendo realizado múltiples publicaciones en revistas científicas y recientemente publicando el libro "Antrozoología y la relación humano-perro", el cual está basado en su tesis doctoral.

Marcelo Rodríguez Ceberio, LINCS (Laboratorio de investigación en Neurociencias y Ciencias sociales), Universidad de Flores, Escuela Sistémica Argentina

Director Doctorado en Psicología. Universidad de Flores

Director Académico e Investigación. Escuela Sistémica Argentina

Director LINCS (Laboratorio de investigación en Neurociencias y Ciencias sociales) ESA-UFLO

Referências

Albert, A. y Bulcroft, K. (1988). Pets, families, and the life course. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(2), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.2307/352019

Allen, K. (1995). Coping with life changes and transitions: The role of pets. Interactions, 13(3), 5-8.

Allen, K. (2002). Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends, and spouses: The truth about cats and dogs. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(5), 727-739. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000024236.11538.41

American Veterinary Medical Association [AVMA]. (2018). Pet ownership & demographic (2017-18). Recuperado a partir de https://www.avma.org/News/PressRoom/Pages/AVMA-releases-latest-stats-on-pet-ownership-and-veterinary-care.aspx

Augliere, B. (2016). Debate. Recuperado a partir de http://naturenews.disqus.com/

Beck, L. y Madresh, E. A. (2008). Romantic partners and four-legged friends: An extension of attachment theory to relationships with pets. Anthrozoös, 21(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279308X274056

Belk, R. W. (1996). Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society & Animals, 4(2), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853096X00115

Botigué, L. R., Song, S., Scheu, A., Gopalan, S., Pendleton, A. L., Oetjens, M., … Veeramah, K. R. (2017). Ancient European dog genomes reveal continuity since the Early Neolithic. Nature Communications, 8(1), 16082. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16082

Bovisio, M., Cicuttin, G., Fracuelli, M. C., González, B. B., Lencinas, O. E., Mestres, N., … Marcos, E. R. (2004). Características de la convivencia humano-animal en la CABA y su relación con la prevención de zoonosis. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Zoonosis Luis Pasteur.

Bowen, M. (1966). The use of family theory in clinical practice. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 7(5), 345-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(66)80065-2

Bowen, M. (1978/1993). Family therapy in clinical practice. Maryland: Jason Aronson.

Bowlby, J. (1969/1998). El apego y la pérdida 1: El apego. Barcelona: Paidós.

Cain, A. O. (1985). Pets as family members. Marriage & Family Review, 8(3-4), 5-10.

Ceberio, M. R. (1994). Ciencias modernas, complejidad y psicoterapia. En G. Nardone y P. Watzlawick (Eds.), Terapia breve, filosofía y arte (pp. 13-34). Barcelona: Herder.

Ceberio, M. R. (2010). La nave de los locos. Buenos Aires: Teseo.

Ceberio, M. R. (2015). John Bowlby: Del psicoanálisis a la etología y la cibernética. En J. Bowlby, Vínculos afectivos (6.ª ed., pp. 1-8). Madrid: Morata.

Ceberio, M. R. (2017). El genograma. Quién soy y de dónde vengo. Madrid: Morata.

Ceberio, M. R. y Serebrinsky, H. (2011). Dentro y fuera de la caja negra. Buenos Aires: Psicolibro.

Charles, N. (2014). ‘Animals just love you as you are’: Experiencing kinship across the species barrier. Sociology, 48(4), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513515353

Cohen, S. P. (2002). Can pets function as family members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394502320555386

Covert, A. M., Whiren, A. P., Keith, J. y Nelson, C. (1985). Pets, early adolescents, and families. Marriage & Family Review, 8(3-4), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v08n03_08

Cyrulnik, B. (1999). Autobiografía de un espantapájaros. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Díaz Videla, M. (2015). El miembro no humano de la familia: Las mascotas a través del ciclo vital familiar. Revista Ciencia Animal, 9, 83-98.

Díaz Videla, M. (2017). Antrozoología y la relación humano-perro. Buenos Aires: iRojo.

Díaz Videla, M. y Olarte, M. A. (2016). Animales de compañía, personalidad humana y los beneficios percibidos por los custodios. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 8(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5872/psiencia.v8i2.201

Díaz Videla, M. y Olarte, M. A. (2018). La psicología del vínculo humano-animal. Aportes de la psicología a la antrozoología y viceversa. En M. Díaz Videla y M. A. Olarte (Eds.), Antrozoología (pp. 1-21). Buenos Aires: Akadia.

Duncan, S. y Smith, D. (2006). Individualisation versus the geography of ‘new’ families. Londres: Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group, South Bank University.

European Pet Food Industry Federation [FEDIAF]. (2017). Facts and figures. Recuperado a partir de http://www.fediaf.org/who-we-are/european-statistics.html

Falicov, C. (1991). Contribuciones de la sociología de la familia y de la terapia familiar al “esquema del desarrollo familiar”: Análisis comparativo y reflexiones sobre las tendencias futuras. En C. Falicov (Ed.), Transiciones de la familia (pp. 31-95). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Faver, C. y Cavazos, A. (2008). Love, safety, and companionship: The human-animal bond and latino families. Journal of Family Social Work, 11(3), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522150802292350

Galton, F. (1865). The first steps towards the domestication of animals. Transactions of the Ethnological Society of London, 3, 122-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/3014161

GfK. (2016). Pet ownership. Global GfK Survey. Recuperado a partir de https://www.gfk.com/fileadmin/user_upload/country_one_pager/AR/documents/Global-GfK-survey_Pet-Ownership_2016.pdf

Gimeno Collado, A. (1999). La familia: El desafío de la diversidad. Barcelona: Ariel.

Gray, P. B. y Young, S. M. (2011). Human–pet dynamics in cross-cultural perspective. Anthrozoös, 24(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X12923300467285

Guéguen, N. y Ciccotti, S. (2008). Domestic dogs as facilitators in social interaction: An evaluation of helping and courtship behaviors. Anthrozoös, 21(4), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708X371564

Herzog, H. (2012). Los amamos, los odiamos y... Los comemos: Esa relación tan especial con los animales. Barcelona: Kairós.

Hirschman, E. C. (1994). Consumers and their animal companions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1086/209374

Hodgson, K. y Darling, M. (2011). Pets in the family: Practical approaches. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 47(5), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5695

Johnson, A. y Bruneau, L. (2019). Pets and relationships: How animals help us understand ourselves and our connections with others. En L. Kogan y K. Blazina (Eds.), Clinician’s guide to treating companion animal issues (pp. 173-191). Londres: Academic Press.

Kerr, M. y Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation. New York: Norton and Company.

Kim, J., LaRose, R. y Peng, W. (2009). Loneliness as the Cause and the Effect of Problematic Internet Use: The relationship between internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451-455. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0327

Leow, C. (2018). It’s not just a dog: The role of companion animals in the family’s emotional system (Tesis de maestría). University of Nebraska, Estados Unidos.

McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E. y Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239-1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024506

McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R. y Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Minuchin, S. (1977). Familias y terapia familiar. Barcelona: Juan Granica.

Minuchin, S. y Fischman, H. C. (2004). Técnicas de terapia familiar. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., … Kikusui, T. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348(6232), 333-336. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261022

O’Haire, M. (2010). Companion animals and human health: Benefits, challenges, and the road ahead. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 5(5), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.02.002

Palmer, R. y Custance, D. (2008). A counterbalanced version of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation Procedure reveals secure-base effects in dog–human relationships. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109(2-4), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.002

Pittman, F. (1990). Momentos decisivos: Tratamiento de familias en situaciones de crisis. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Poresky, R. H. y Hendrix, C. (1990). Differential effects of pet presence and pet-bonding on young children. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.67.5.51-54

Power, E. (2008). Furry families: Making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802217790

Prato-Previde, E., Spiezio, C., Sabatini, F. y Custance, D. M. (2003). Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth’s strange situation. Behaviour, 140(2), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853903321671514

Roseneil, S. y Budgeon, S. (2004). Cultures of intimacy and care beyond ‘the family’: Personal life and social change in the early 21st century. Current Sociology, 52(2), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104041798

Sable, P. (2013). The pet connection: An attachment perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0405-2

Sanders, C. R. (1998). The canine-human «with»: Dogs, people, and public interaction. International Society for Anthrozoology, 16(1), 11-15.

Schvaneveldt, P. L., Young, M. H., Schvaneveldt, J. D. y Kivett, V. R. (2001). Interaction of People and Pets in the Family Setting: A life course perspective. Journal of Teaching in Marriage & Family, 1(2), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J226v01n02_03

Serpell, J. (1989). Pet-keeping and animal domestication: A reappraisal. Londres: Unwin Hyman.

Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Serpell, J. y Paul, E. (2011). Pets in the family: An evolutionary perspective. En C. A. Salmon y T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 298-309). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simon, F. B., Stierlin, H. y Wynne, L. C. (1988). Vocabulario de terapia familiar. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.

Simpson, M. G. y Keulyan, G. (2018). El perro como tutor de resiliencia en procesos de orientación y de TAA. En M. Díaz Videla y M. A. Olarte (Eds.), Antrozoología, multidisciplinario campo de investigación (pp. 58-71). Buenos Aires: Akadia.

Smart, C. y Shipman, B. (2004). Visions in monochrome: Families, marriage and the individualization thesis. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(4), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00034.x

Turner, W. G. (2005). The role of companion animals throughout the family life cycle. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J039v09n0402

Vaillant, G. (2012). Triumphs of experience. The men of the Harvard Grant Study. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Valadez Azúa, R. (2000). El origen del perro, primera parte (entre el lobo y el perro). Revista AMMVEPE, 11(3), 75-84.

Walsh, F. (2009). Human-Animal Bonds II: The role of pets in family systems and family therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01297.x

Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M. y Shaver, P. R. (2011). An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.04.001

Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M. y Shaver, P. R. (2012). Pets as safe havens and secure bases: The moderating role of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.06.005

Publicado

2019-12-19

Como Citar

Díaz Videla, M., & Rodríguez Ceberio, M. (2019). As mascotes no Sistema Familiar. Legitimidade, Formação e dinâmicas das famílias humano-animal. Jornal De Psicologia, 18(2), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe036