Quiet Quitting
Conceptual considerations on an emerging phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e148Keywords:
agenda, quiet quitting, predictorsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has undermined many of the principles that governed the world of work. Alongside the so-called Great Resignation, another concerning phenomenon has begun to emerge in the past year, labeled quiet quitting. Since this is a novel issue with limited empirical research, the present paper aims to provide some conceptual clarifications regarding the construct of quiet quitting and to develop theoretical assumptions about its relationships with other forms of organizational behavior that could emerge as significant predictors. In this regard, it focuses on proposing hypothetical links with organizational cynicism, job embeddedness, job satisfaction, work engagement, commitment, and organizational justice. The essay concludes by suggesting some lines of research that, as an agenda, may guide future studies on this topic.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Arreola Bravo, F., Pérez Melo, A. y Canizales Rodríguez, J. (2023). Percepción de justicia y su efecto moderador en la identidad y compromiso organizacional en la empresa familiar: desarrollo de supuestos teóricos. Ciencias Administrativas, 21, 114. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e114
Atalay, M., Aydemir, P. y Acuner, V. (2022). The influence of emotional exhaustion on organizational cynicism: The sequential mediating effect of organizational identification and trust in organization. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093343
Baker, E. (2023). The Age of the Crisis of Work. What is the sound of quiet quitting? Harpers Magazine. https://harpers.org/archive/2023/05/the-age-of-the-crisis-of-work-quiet-quitting-great-resignation/
Banks, G., Gooty, J., Ross, R., Williams, C. y Harrington, N. (2018). Construct redundancy in leader behaviours: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 236-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.005
Basha, M., Sucharitha, M., Lakshmi, M. y Kumar, J. (2023). Talent retention, job involvement satisfaction, and commitment towards the organization in the IT sector. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2888(1),1-6. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0164526
Bogler, R. y Berkovich, I. (2020). A systematic review of empirical evidence on teachers' organizational commitment 1994–2018. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(3), 440-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1774783
Buscaglia, M. (4 de septiembre de 2022). A quick look at the origins and outcomes of the trendy term. Chicago Tribune. https://www.pressreader.com/usa/chicago-tribune-sunday/20220904/282226604550365
Carpenter, N., Whitman, D. y Amrhein, R. (2021). Unit-level counterproductive work behaviour (CWB): A conceptual review and quantitative summary. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1498-1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320978812
Chaudhry, M., Hameed, Z. y Ahmed, F. (2023). Effect of abusive supervision on organizational cynicism (Cognitive, affective, behavioural) mediating effect of playing dumb. PLoS One, 18(4), e0284884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284884
Cho, S., Carpenter, N. y Zhang, B. (2020). An item-level investigation of conceptual and empirical distinctiveness of proactivity constructs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(3), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12287
Colquitt, J., Hill, E. y De Cremer, D. (2023). Forever focused on fairness: 75 years of organizational justice in Personnel Psychology. Personnel Psychology, 76(2), 413-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.125564
Deng, J., Hao, X. y Yang, T. (2023). The increase of counterproductive work behaviour from organizational and individual level due to workplace conflict: A sequential moderated mediation model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(2), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-04-2022-0079
Engelen, A., Rieger, V., Wehner, M. y Heidemann, F. (2022). Is organizational commitment to IT good for employees? The role of industry dynamism and concentration. MIS Quarterly, 46(4), 2387-2404. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2022/16588
Espada, M. (23 de agosto de 2022). Employees say ‘quiet quitting’ is just setting boundaries. Companies fear long-term effects. Time. https://time.com/6208115/quiet-quitting-companies-response/
Formica, S. y Sfodera, F. (2022). The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting paradigm shifts: An overview of current situation and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(8), 899-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2136601
Gibbs, Z. y Duke, G. (2020). Job embeddedness: The differences between registered nurses and healthcare assistants. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 43(6), 530-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945920963801
Hamouche, S., Koritos, C. y Papastathopoulos, A. (2023). Quiet quitting: relationship with other concepts and implications for tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(12), 4297-4312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2022-1362
Harter, J. (2022). Is quiet quitting real? Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx
Huang, H., Xia, X., Zhao, W., Pan, X. y Zhou, X. (2021). Overwork, job embeddedness and turnover intention among Chinese knowledge workers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12272
Jagacinski, C. M., Kumar, S. y Keith, M. G. (2020). Expanding the nomological network of work avoidance: Antecedents and consequences across contexts. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(2), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1635564
Joubert, J., Jacobs, M. y de Beer, L. (2023). Work engagement mediation of job security, job embeddedness, and turnover intention within the South African mining sector. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 33(4), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2219541
Judge, T., Zhang, S. y Glerum, D. (2020). Job satisfaction. En V. Sessa y N. Bowling (Eds.), Essentials of job attitudes and other workplace psychological constructs (pp. 207-241). Routledge.
Kieczkier, E. (17 de agosto de 2022). La Gran Renuncia versión argentina: sigue alto el nivel de desvinculaciones voluntarias. IProfesional. https://www.iprofesional.com/management/367843-gran-renuncia-version-argentina-desvinculaciones-voluntarias
Klotz, A. (3 de junio de 2022). The Great Resignation is still here, but whether it stays is up to leaders. The Forum Network. https://www.oecd-forum.org/posts/the-great-resignation-is-still-here-but-whether-it-stays-is-up-to-leaders
Krizanovic, P. (2023). Renuncia silenciosa: por qué 4 de cada 10 argentinos hacen el mínimo trabajo posible. IProfesional. https://www.iprofesional.com/management/378565-renuncia-silenciosa-4-de-cada-10-argentinos-hacen-minimo-trabajo
Lazzari, M., Alvarez, J. y Ruggieri, S. (2022). Predicting and explaining employee turnover intention. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 14, 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00329-w
Le, H., Schmidt, F. L., Harter, J. K. y Lauver, K. J. (2010). The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.02.003
Lewin, L. (1 de diciembre de 2022). Cuidado con la renuncia silenciosa en las escuelas. Infobae. https://www.infobae.com/opinion/2022/12/01/cuidado-con-la-renuncia-silenciosa-en-las-escuelas/
Littlewood Zimmerman, H. (2020). La paradoja del compromiso. Investigación Administrativa, 49(126), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.35426/iav49n126.01
Mahand, T. y Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting. Causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9
Özkan, A. (2023). Organizational justice perceptions and turnover intention: A meta-analytic review. Kybernetes, 52(8), 2886-2899. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2022-0119
Pearce, K. (12 de septiembre de 2022). What is 'quiet quitting'? Hub: Johns Hopkins University. https://hub.jhu.edu/2022/09/12/what-is-quiet-quitting/
Philip, J. y Medina-Craven, M. (2022). An examination of job embeddedness and organizational commitment in the context of HRD practices. Management Research Review, 45(12), 1592-1607. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0224
Salessi, S. (2018). Cinismo organizacional. En H. Littlewood (Ed.), Psicología Organizacional: una visión Latinoamericana (pp. 2645-266). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Salessi, S. (2022). Escala de arraigo laboral: evidencias de validez y normas de referencia para docentes argentinos. Revista Psicología y Educación, 17(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2022.02.223
Salessi, S. y Omar, A. (2014). Cinismo organizacional: consecuencias sobre la salud mental de los trabajadores. Psicología y Salud, 24(2), 269-277.
Salessi, S. y Omar, A. (2018). Cuestionario de implicación en el trabajo: Propiedades psicométricas de su adaptación en Argentina. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 35(2), 179-192.
Salessi, S. y Omar, A. (2019). Implicación con el trabajo en la investigación contemporánea: Actualización y estado del arte. Papeles del Psicólogo, 40(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2882
Salessi, S., Omar, A. y de Andrade, A. (2021). Escala de satisfacción laboral genérica: baremos regionales para Argentina y Brasil. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 13(2).
Scheyett, A. (2023). Quiet quitting. Social Work, 68(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac051
Serenko, A. (2023). The great resignation: The great knowledge exodus or the onset of the great knowledge revolution? Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 1042-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2021-0920
Vaamonde, J. D., Omar, A. y Salessi, S. (2018). From organizational justice perceptions to turnover intentions: The mediating effects of burnout and job satisfaction. European Journal of Psychology (EJPO), 14(3), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1490
Xiao, M. y Cooke, F. L. (2019). Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful: A review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(4), 470-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12198
Zaza, S., Joseph, D. y Armstrong, D. (2023). Are IT professionals unique? A second-order meta-analytic comparison of turnover intentions across occupations. MIS Quarterly, 47(3), 1213-1238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/16951
Zenger, J. y Folkman, J. (31 de agosto de 2022). Quiet quitting is about bad bosses, not bad employees. Harvard Business. https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is-about-bad-bosses-not-bad-employees
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Solana Magalí Salessi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal, agree with the following terms:
a. Authors will retain its copyright and will ensure the rights of first publication of its work to the journal, which will be at the same time subject to the Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) allowing third parties to share the work as long as the author and the first publication on this journal is indicated.
b. Authors may elect other non-exclusive license agreements of the distribution of the published work (for example: locate it on an institutional telematics file or publish it on an monographic volume) as long as the first publication on this journal is indicated,
c. Authors are allowed and suggested to disseminate its work through the internet (for example: in institutional telematics files or in their website) before and during the submission process, which could produce interesting exchanges and increase the references of the published work. (see The effect of open Access)