Emociones y decisiones en la empresa familiar: Una propuesta de análisis fenomenológico interpretativo

Francisco Moises Arreola; Juan Antonio Aguilar Rodríguez; Juan Cayetano Niebla Zatarain

doi:10.24215/23143738e047

Authors

Francisco Moises Arreola Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Unidad Regional Mazatlán. México
Juan Antonio Aguilar Rodríguez Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Unidad Regional Mazatlán. México
Juan Cayetano Niebla Zatarain Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Unidad Regional Mazatlán. México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e047

Keywords:

Family business; lived experience; phenomenology; existential subjects.

Abstract

In this paper we found a very limited number of phenomenological studies in organizations and even more in the field of family business. Interpretative Phenomenology is proposed as method to make possible to generate phenomenological themes and analyse the decision making process and its relationship with emotions in family business. Socioemotional wealth theory and the socioemotional dimensions were used to identify and associate lived experiences and decisions with four existential subjects: spatiality, corporeality, temporality and relationality. For future research lines with phenomenological analysis applying phenomenological interview based on the family business archetypes, succession and emotional ownership is proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Francisco Moises Arreola, Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Unidad Regional Mazatlán. México

Doctor en Ciencias Administrativas por la Universidad de Occidente, Unidad Culiacán. Profesor de tiempo completo en la Universidad de Occidente, Unidad Mazatlán. Miembro del Cuerpo Académico en Organizaciones Turísticas. Líneas de investigación: Estudios organizacionales en el campo de la empresa familiar, identidad organizacional y educación.

ORCID: 0000-0002-6343-8590

arreolabravofranciscomoises@hotmail.com

Juan Antonio Aguilar Rodríguez, Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Unidad Regional Mazatlán. México

Doctor en Estudios Organizacionales por la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa. Profesor Investigador en la Universidad de Occidente Unidad Mazatlán, adscrito al Departamento Académico de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Miembro del Cuerpo Académico en Organizaciones Turísticas. Miembro de la Red Mexicana de Investigadores en Estudios Organizacionales. Distinción por parte del PRODEP como profesor con perfil preferente. Su interés de investigación se enfoca al estudio de las organizaciones en aspectos relacionados con la toma de decisiones, gobernanza y desempeño organizacional.

jaguilar27@hotmail.com

Juan Cayetano Niebla Zatarain, Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Unidad Regional Mazatlán. México

Doctor en Estudios Organizacionales por la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa. Profesor Investigador en la Universidad de Occidente, Unidad Mazatlán, adscrito al Departamento Académico de Ciencias Económico Administrativas. Miembro del Cuerpo Académico en Organizaciones Turísticas. Miembro de la Red Mexicana de Investigadores en Estudios Organizacionales. Líneas de investigación: Empresa familiar y procesos organizacionales.

jnieblaz@gmail.com

References

Arreola, F., Niebla, J., Ramírez. G. (2015). Los factores socioemocionales y el proceso de sucesión en las empresas familiares. Ciencia Ergo Sum, 22(2), 103-115.

Astrachan, J., Zahra, S. y Sharma, P. (2003). Family-Sponsored Ventures. The Entrepreneurial Advantage Of Nations: First Annual Global Entrepreneurship Symposium. 1-15.

Berrone, P., Cruz, C. y Gómez-Mejía, L. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279.

Chua, J., Chrisman, J., y De Massis, A. (2015). A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice, 39(2), 173-182.

Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 604-623.

Cruz, C., Larraza-Kintana, M., Garcés-Galdeano, L. y Berrone, P. (2014) ¿Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreunership Theory and Practice, october-november, 1295-1316.

Daft, R. y Bradshaw, P. (1980). The process of horizontal differentiation: Two models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 444-456.

Daspit, J., Holt, D., Chrisman, J. y Long, R. (2015). Examining Family Firm Succession From a Social Exchange Perspective: A Multiphase, Multistake holder Review. Family Business Review, july-september, 1–21.

De Massis, A., Sharma, P., Chua, J. H. y Chrisman, J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. MA: Edward Elgary.

Farina, G. (2014). Some reflections on the phenomenological method. Crossing dialogues Journal. 7(2), 50-62.

Gill, M. (2014). The Possibilities of Phenomenology for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118-137.

Giorgi, A. (1997). The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a qualitative Research Procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28 (2), 235-260.

Gómez-Mejía, L., Haynes, K., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K., y Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.

Habbershon, T. G. y Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 27–39.

Helin, J. y Jabri, M. (2016). Family business succession in dialogue: The case of differing backgrounds and views. International Small Business Journal, 34(4), 487–505.

Holt, R., y Sandberg, J. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. En H. Tsoukas y R. Chia (Eds.) Philosophy and organization theory (research in the sociology of organizations) (pp. 215-249). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Husserl, E. (1982). La idea de la fenomenología (1ra. Ed.). México: Fondo de cultura económica.

Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (Trad. W. R. Boyce Gibson). London: Routledge.

Kakkonen, M. (2006). Intuition and Entrepreneurs: A Phenomenological Study of managerial intuition of finish family entrepreneurs. Academic disertation, School of business and economics, University of Jyväskylä.

Kempster, S. y Cope, J. (2010). Learning to lead in the entrepreneurial context. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(1), 5–34.

Kepner, E. (1983). The family and the firm: A co-evolutionary perspective. Family Business Review, 4 (4), 445-461.

Labaki, R., Tsabari, N. y Zachary, R. (2013). Exploring the emotional nexus in cogent family business archetypes. De Gruyter, 3(3), 301-336.

Madison, K., Holt, D. T., Kellermanns, F. W., y Ranft, A. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 28(1), 65-93.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). Fenomenología de la percepción (1ra. Ed.). España: Planeta-Agostini.

Miller, D., y Le Breton-Miller, I. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 713-720.

Neubaum, D., Thomas, C., Dibrell, C. y Craig, J. (2017). Stewardship Climate Scale: An Assessment of Reliability and Validity. Family Business Review, 30 (1), 37–60.

Newbert, S. y Craig, J. (2017). Moving Beyond Socioemotional Wealth: Toward a NormativeTheory of Decision Making in Family Business. January-april, Family Business Review, 1–8.

Petruzzo, A., Paturzo, M., Naletto, M., Cohen, M., Alvaro, R. y Vellone, E. (2017). The lived experience of care givers of persons with heart failure: A phenomenological study, European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, july-september, 1–8.

Reay, T., y Zhang, Z. (2014). Qualitative methods in family business research. En L. Melin, M. Nordqvist y P. Sharma (Eds), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 573-593). London: Sage Publications.

Rehman, S., y Roomi, M. A. (2012). Gender and work-life balance: A phenomenological study of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(2), 209-228.

Revilla, A., Pérez-Luño, A. y Nieto, M. (2016). Does Family Involvement in Management Reduce theRisk of Business Failure? The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Family Business Review, october-december, 1-15.

Sanders, P. (1982). Phenomenology: A new way of viewing organizational research. The Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 353-360.

Schulze, W. y Kellermanns, F. (2015). Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, january-april, 447-459.

Shepherd, D. (2016). An Emotions Perspective for Advancing the Fields of Family Business and Entrepreneurship: Stocks, Flows, Reactions, and Responses. Family Business Review, 29(2), 151–158.

Van Manen, M. (1998). El tacto en la enseñanza: el significado de la sensibilidad pedagógica (1ra. Ed.). Argentina: Paidós.

Van Manen, M. (2003). Investigación educativa y experiencia vivida (1ra. Ed.). España: Idea Books.

Van Manen, M. (2006). Writing Qualitatively, or the Demands of Writing. Qualitative health research, 16(5), 713-722.

Van Manen, M. (2014). On Ethical (In) Decisions Experienced by Parents of Infants in Neonatal IntensiveCare. Qualitative Health Research, 24(2), 279–287.