Protein determination: a diagnostic resource to evaluate sera from cattle with paratuberculosis

Electrophoresis, a diagnostic resource to evaluate bovine sera with paratuberculosis

Authors

  • Graciela Sara Miceli Cátedra de Inmunología Veterinaria Aplicada. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. UNLP.
  • María Fiorella Alvarado Pinedo CEDIVE. FCV. UNLP
  • Roberto Damián Moyano Laboratorio de Paratuberculosis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, INTA Castelar
  • Gabriel Eduardo Travería CEDIVE. FCV. UNLP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e037

Keywords:

Bovine paratuberculosis, albumin, globulin, electrophoresis

Abstract

Bovine serum proteins were analyzed in sera from bovines from a herd with endemic paratuberculosis, an infectious disease associated with diarrhea, loss of body condition, cachexia and death. A group of negative animals was compared with a group of positive animals to 3 diagnostic tests for paratuberculosis (mycobateriological culture of feces, intradermal inoculation of avian tuberculin and antibody detection by indirect ELISA). Serum protein concentrations and their different fractions were analyzed by the colorimetric method and electrophoresis. Bayesian credible intervals were statistically different, with a lower albumin concentration and higher gamma globulin concentration in the positive group compared to the negative group. The albumin/globulin ratio was also statistically different with decreased ratio in the positive group. No statistical differences were observed in alpha and beta
protein fractions. The decreased albumin in the positive group partly explains the poor productive performance and emphasizes the convenience to test and cull positive animals not only to avoid economic losses, but also as a control measure to reduce dissemination of the disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alvarado Pinedo MF. 2015. Posibilidades diagnósticas de la PPD aviar en la paratuberculosis bovina en animales jóvenes. Tesis doctoral Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Disponible en: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/48228

Collins MT, Wells SJ, Petrini KR, Collins JE, Schultz RD, Whitlock RH. 2005. Evaluation of five antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 12(6):685-­92. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.6.685­692.2005

Costanzo G, Pinedo FA, MonML, Viale M, Gil A, Illia MC, Gioffré A, Arese A, Travería G, Romano MI. 2012. Accuracy assessment and screening of a dairy herd with paratuberculosis by three different ELISAs. Veterinary Microbiology. 156(1­2):183­-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.029

Donat K, Erhardt G, Soschinka A, Brandt HR. 2014. Decreased serum protein associated with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis shedding in German Holstein cows. Veterinary Record. 174(16):408. doi: 10.1136/vr.101957

Gautam M, Ridler A, Wilson PR, Heuer C. 2018. Control of clinical paratuberculosis in New Zealand pastoral livestock. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 66(1):1­-8. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2017.1379914

Heer E, Margni R. 1971. Electro e inmunoelectroforesis. Manual de laboratorio e interpretaciones fundamentales. Buenos Aires

Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML.1997. Serum proteins and the dysproteinemias. En:Kaneko JJ (Ed):Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals.5ta Ed. London, Academic Press, pp. 117-­38.

Kaneko JJ,Harvey JW, BrussML. 2008. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 6ta Ed. London. Academic Press.

Koets AP, Eda S, Sreevatsan S. 2015. The within host dynamics of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infection in cattle: where time and place matter. Veterinary Research. 46(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13567­015­0185­0

Kruschke JK. 2013. Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 142(2):573-­603. doi: 10.1037/a0029146

Meyer A, McAloon CG, Tratalos JA, More SJ, Citer LR, Graham DA, Sergeant ESG. 2019. Modeling of alternative testing strategies to demonstrate freedom from Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infection in test­negative dairy herds in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(3):2427-­42. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018­14883

Miceli G, Bonzo E, Fontana L. 2014. Electroforesis en acetato de celulosa: comparación de resultados. XX Reunión Científica y Técnica de la Asociación Argentina de Veterinarios de Laboratorio de Diagnóstico. Tucumán, Argentina, p. 57.

Mortier RA, Barkema HW, De Buck J. 2015. Susceptibility to and diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in dairy calves: A review. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 121(3­4):189-­98. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.08.011

Nielsen SS, Toft N. 2008. Ante mortem diagnosis of paratuberculosis: a review of accuracies of ELISA, interferon­gamma assay and faecal culture techniques. Veterinary Microbiology. 129(3­4):217­-35. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.011

Nagy O,Tothová C, Nagyova V, Kovac G. 2015. Comparison of serumprotein electrophoretic pattern in cow and small rumiants. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 84:187­-95. doi: 10.2754/avb201584020187

Over K, Crandall PG, O'Bryan CA, Ricke SC. 2011. Current perspectives on Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, Johne's disease, and Crohn's disease: a review. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 37(2):141-­56. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2010.532480

Park HT, Yoo HS. 2016. Development of vaccines to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection. Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research. 5(2):108-­16. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2016.5.2.108

R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.URL https://www.R­project.org/

Roussel AJ. 2011.Control of paratuberculosis in beef cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice. 27(3):593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.07.005

SENASA 2012. Disponible en: http:// www.senasa.gob.ar/sites/default/files/ARBOL_SENASA/INFORMACION/NORMATIVA/RESOL_Y_ANEXOS/reso_128_articulos_1­ 107.pdf. [Consultado 16/02/2019]

Shrestha S, Vosough Ahmadi B, Barratt AS, Thomson SG, Stott AW. 2018. Financial vulnerability of dairy farms challenged by Johne's disease to changes in farm payment support. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 5:316. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00316

Stabel JR. 1997. An improved method for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples and comparison to three other methods. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 9(4):375-­80. doi: 10.1177/104063879700900406

Sweeney RW. 2011. Pathogenesis of paratuberculosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice. 27(3):537­-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.07.001

Sweeney RW. 1996. Transmission of paratuberculosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice. 12 (2):305-­12. doi: 10.1016/S0749­0720(15)30408­4

Tothova C, Nagy O, Kovac G.2016. Serum proteins and their diagnostic utility in veterinary medicine: a review. Veterinarni Medicina. 61(9):475-­96. doi: 10.17221/19/2016­VETMED

Whitlock RH, Buergelt C. 1996. Preclinical and clinical manifestations of paratuberculosis (including pathology). Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice. 12(2):345­-56. doi: 10.1016/S0749­0720(15)30410­2

Whittington RJ, Whittington AM, Waldron A, Begg DJ, de Silva K, Purdie AC, Plain KM. 2013. Development and validation of a liquid medium (M7H9C) for routine culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis to replace modifiedBactec 12B medium. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 51(12):3993-­4000. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01373­13

Whittington RJ, Begg DJ, de Silva K, Purdie AC, Dhand NK, Plain KM. 2017. Case definition terminology for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease). BMC Veterinary Research. 13(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12917­017­1254­6

You Q, Verschoor CP, Pant SD, Macri J, Kirby GM, Karrow NA. 2012. Proteomic analysis of plasma from Holstein cows testing positive for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 148(3­4):243-­51. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.05.002

Published

2019-12-03

How to Cite

Miceli, G. S., Alvarado Pinedo, M. F., Moyano, R. D., & Travería, G. E. (2019). Protein determination: a diagnostic resource to evaluate sera from cattle with paratuberculosis: Electrophoresis, a diagnostic resource to evaluate bovine sera with paratuberculosis. Analecta Veterinary, 39(2), 037. https://doi.org/10.24215/15142590e037

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)