Organizational Reforms versus Bureaucracy “The Case of ESTIA University”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e007Keywords:
ESTIA, reforms, organization, educational satisfactionAbstract
The present research aims to describe the particular characteristics of ESTIA (Ecole Supérieur des Technologies Industrielles Avancées), and the effect that the latest legal reforms have had on the organization and functioning of ESTIA, as well as, on the job satisfaction of teachers. The research concludes that teachers defend traditional values that organizational reforms and current demands hurts.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
References
Bentley, P.J., Coates, H., Dobson, I.R., Goedegebuure, L., y Meek, V.L. (2013). Factors associated with job satisfaction amongst Australian University academics and future workforce implications. P.J. Bently, H. Coates, I.R. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, y V.L. Meek, Job satisfaction around the academic world. Londres: Springer.
Bess, J.L. (1988). Collegiality and Bureaucracy in the modern university. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Birnbaum, R. (2004). The End of Shared Governance: Looking Ahead or Looking Back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004 (127), 5-22.
Bozeman, B., y Gaughan, M. (2011). Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154-186.
Capelleras, J.L. (2005). Attitudes of academic staff towards their job and organisation: an empirical assessment. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(2), 147-166.
Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503-517.
Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Ángeles: University of California Press.
Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, managerialism and leadership in English universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 1(2), 161-169.
Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., y Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56 (3), 325–348.
Filippakou, O. y Tapper, T. (2007). Quality assurance in higher education: thinking beyond the english experience. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 339–360.
Frías, R. (2012). Estudio de Satisfacción del Profesorado en la Universidad Pública Española. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (11), 175-204.
Hagedorn, L.S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New directions for institutional research, 2000(105), 5-20.
Harvey, L. (1995). The New Collegialism. Improvement with Accountability. Tertiary Education & Management, 1(2), 153-160.
Herzberg, F., Mauser, B., y Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley.
Krasner, S.D. (1988). Sovereignty. An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66-94.
Lenartowicz, M. (2015). The nature of the university. Higher education, 69, 947-961.
McInnis, C. (1998). Academics and Professional Administrators in Australian Universities: dissolving boundaries and new tensions 1. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), 161-173.
Middlehurst, R. (2013). Changing Internal Governance: Are Leadership Roles and Management Structures in United Kingdom Universities Fit for the Future? Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 275–294.
Millet, J.D. (1962). The academic community: an essay on organization. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Mintzberg, H. (1984). La estructura de las organizaciones. Barcelona: Ariel.
Mora, J.G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 95-110.
Olaskoaga, J., González, X., Marúm, E., y Onaindia, E. (2015). Reformas organizativas en las Instituciones de Educación Superior, condiciones laborales y reacciones de los académicos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 6(17), 102-118.
Olaskoaga, J., Marúm, E., y Rosario, V. (2013). Configuraciones estructurales en las instituciones de educación superior y actitudes de los académicos frente a la calidad. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 2(2), 130-142.
Padilla, L.E., Jiménez, L., y Ramírez, M.D.L.D. (2008). La satisfacción con el trabajo académico: Motivaciones y condiciones del entorno institucional que la afectan. El caso de una universidad pública estatal. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 13(38), 843-864.
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., y Goastellec, G. (2009). A comparative approach to higher education reforms in Western European countries. In University governance, 197-225.
Parker, M., y Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity. Organization, 2(2), 319-338.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rhoades, G. y Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1) 3-28.
Salaburu, P., Mees, L., y Pérez, J.I. (2003). Sistemas universitarios en Europa y EEUU. Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes.
Shattock, M. (2013). University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217–233.
Shin, J.C., y Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67(5), 603-620.
Stensaker, B. y Vabø, A. (2013). Re-inventing shared governance: implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 256-274.
Szekeres, J. (2004). The invisible workers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(1), 7-22.
Szekeres, J. (2011). Professional staff carve out a new space. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 679-691.
Tapper, T. y Palfreyman, D. (2002). Understanding collegiality: the changing oxbridge model. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1), 47-63.
Villarreal, O. y Landeta, J. (2010).El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en dirección y economía de la empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 3, 31-52.
Waugh, W.L. (1998). Conflicting Values and Cultures: the Managerial threat to University Governance. Review of Policy Research, 15(4), 61-74.
http://www.ambafrance-es.org
http://www.estia.fr
Bess, J.L. (1988). Collegiality and Bureaucracy in the modern university. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Birnbaum, R. (2004). The End of Shared Governance: Looking Ahead or Looking Back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004 (127), 5-22.
Bozeman, B., y Gaughan, M. (2011). Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154-186.
Capelleras, J.L. (2005). Attitudes of academic staff towards their job and organisation: an empirical assessment. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(2), 147-166.
Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503-517.
Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Ángeles: University of California Press.
Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, managerialism and leadership in English universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 1(2), 161-169.
Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., y Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56 (3), 325–348.
Filippakou, O. y Tapper, T. (2007). Quality assurance in higher education: thinking beyond the english experience. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 339–360.
Frías, R. (2012). Estudio de Satisfacción del Profesorado en la Universidad Pública Española. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (11), 175-204.
Hagedorn, L.S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New directions for institutional research, 2000(105), 5-20.
Harvey, L. (1995). The New Collegialism. Improvement with Accountability. Tertiary Education & Management, 1(2), 153-160.
Herzberg, F., Mauser, B., y Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley.
Krasner, S.D. (1988). Sovereignty. An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66-94.
Lenartowicz, M. (2015). The nature of the university. Higher education, 69, 947-961.
McInnis, C. (1998). Academics and Professional Administrators in Australian Universities: dissolving boundaries and new tensions 1. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), 161-173.
Middlehurst, R. (2013). Changing Internal Governance: Are Leadership Roles and Management Structures in United Kingdom Universities Fit for the Future? Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 275–294.
Millet, J.D. (1962). The academic community: an essay on organization. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Mintzberg, H. (1984). La estructura de las organizaciones. Barcelona: Ariel.
Mora, J.G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 95-110.
Olaskoaga, J., González, X., Marúm, E., y Onaindia, E. (2015). Reformas organizativas en las Instituciones de Educación Superior, condiciones laborales y reacciones de los académicos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 6(17), 102-118.
Olaskoaga, J., Marúm, E., y Rosario, V. (2013). Configuraciones estructurales en las instituciones de educación superior y actitudes de los académicos frente a la calidad. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 2(2), 130-142.
Padilla, L.E., Jiménez, L., y Ramírez, M.D.L.D. (2008). La satisfacción con el trabajo académico: Motivaciones y condiciones del entorno institucional que la afectan. El caso de una universidad pública estatal. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 13(38), 843-864.
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., y Goastellec, G. (2009). A comparative approach to higher education reforms in Western European countries. In University governance, 197-225.
Parker, M., y Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity. Organization, 2(2), 319-338.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rhoades, G. y Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1) 3-28.
Salaburu, P., Mees, L., y Pérez, J.I. (2003). Sistemas universitarios en Europa y EEUU. Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes.
Shattock, M. (2013). University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217–233.
Shin, J.C., y Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67(5), 603-620.
Stensaker, B. y Vabø, A. (2013). Re-inventing shared governance: implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 256-274.
Szekeres, J. (2004). The invisible workers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(1), 7-22.
Szekeres, J. (2011). Professional staff carve out a new space. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 679-691.
Tapper, T. y Palfreyman, D. (2002). Understanding collegiality: the changing oxbridge model. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1), 47-63.
Villarreal, O. y Landeta, J. (2010).El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en dirección y economía de la empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 3, 31-52.
Waugh, W.L. (1998). Conflicting Values and Cultures: the Managerial threat to University Governance. Review of Policy Research, 15(4), 61-74.
http://www.ambafrance-es.org
http://www.estia.fr
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
2017-03-27
How to Cite
González Laskibar, X., Garechana Anacabe, G., Cilleruelo Carrasco, E., & Elissalde, P. (2017). Organizational Reforms versus Bureaucracy “The Case of ESTIA University”. Ciencias Administrativas, (10), 007. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e007
Issue
Section
Scientific Articles
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal, agree with the following terms:
a. Authors will retain its copyright and will ensure the rights of first publication of its work to the journal, which will be at the same time subject to the Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) allowing third parties to share the work as long as the author and the first publication on this journal is indicated.
b. Authors may elect other non-exclusive license agreements of the distribution of the published work (for example: locate it on an institutional telematics file or publish it on an monographic volume) as long as the first publication on this journal is indicated,
c. Authors are allowed and suggested to disseminate its work through the internet (for example: in institutional telematics files or in their website) before and during the submission process, which could produce interesting exchanges and increase the references of the published work. (see The effect of open Access)
