The bibliographic review in the doctorate in Administration

Authors

  • Jorge Washington Barrientos Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e049

Keywords:

Administration; doctorate; bibliographic review.

Abstract

The aim of the article is to enhance the understanding that bibliographic review is a mean to improve the contribution of doctoral theses in the discipline.

To do so, the different audiences to which it is directed are identified, some contributions are articulated to illustrate moments of the bibliographic review, and the steps to carry it out are suggested, as well as guidance examples are provided.

The article also alerts on the abundance of sources on the internet and how the positive relationship with the director and/or advisor can contribute positively.

Finally, the article concludes that a solid argumentative construction relies on an appropriate review of documentary sources, and that this task must be recognized in the framework of doctoral maturation, hence the value of different instances of accompaniment offered by the doctoral program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jorge Washington Barrientos, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina.

Doctor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Ciencias Económicas/Administración). MBA Executivo Internacional (FIA/FEA/Universidade de São Paulo), LA (FCE/UBA). Profesor Adjunto Regular FCE/UBA. Investigador Posdoctoral. Centro de Estudios Organizacionales (IADCOM/UBA). Secretario Técnico del Centro de Estudios Organizacionales (FCE/UBA). Doctorando (FCE/UBA). MBA EI (FIA/FEA/Universidade de São Paulo). Lic. en Administración (FCE/UBA)

ORCID: 0000-0002-3445-0750

jwbarrientos@economicas.uba.ar

References

Al-Shammari, A. J. (1994). Management development practices and National Culture: The case of Bahraini Banking Sector (Tesis Doctoral). Glasgow/Scotland.

Armitage, A., y Keeble-Allen, D. (2008). Undertaking a Structured Literature Review or Structuring a Literature Review: Tales from the Field. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(2), 103-114.

Aurik, J., Fabel, M., y Jonk, G. (2014). The History of Strategy and Its Future Prospects. A.T. Kearney Inc.

Carlisle, H. M. (1976). Patterns of Management Thought: The search for new perspectives. USU Faculty Honor Lecture, Utah State University. Recuperado de http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/Honor_lectures/11

Croasdell, D. T., Jenex, M., Yu, Z., Christianson, T., Chakradeo, M., y Makdum, W. (2002). A Meta-Analysis of Methodologies for Research in Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning and Organizational Memory: Five Years at HICSS. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Denyer, D. (27 de 02 de 2017). http://www.daviddenyer.com. Recuperado de http://www.daviddenyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Doing-a-literature-review.pdf

Department of Sociology Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University. (2009). A Guide to Writing a Senior Thesis in Sociology. Cambridge, MA USA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Ericsson, A. K., y Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: The Cabridge University Press.

Grant, M. J., y Booth, A. (2009). A typologyy of reviews: an analysis of 14 reviews types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91-08.

Guirao-Goris, J. A., Olmedo Salas, A., y Ferrer Ferrandis, E. (2008). El artículo de revisión. Revista Interamericana de Enfermería Comunitaria, 1-6.

Hanson, S. O. (1994). Decision Theory: A brief Introduction. (D. o. (KTH), Ed.) Stockholm.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . London • Thousand Oaks • New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Kaushik, A. (Jul/Dec de 2012). Evaluation of internet resources: A review of selected literature. Brazilian Journal of Information Science, 6(2), 61-83. Recuperado de http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/bjis/index

Koontz, H. (2000). Revisión de la jungla administrativa. Revista de Contaduría y Administración, (199), 55-74.

Mancoksky, V. (2009). ¿Qué se espera de una tesis de doctorado? Breve introducción sobre algunas cuestiones y expectativas en torno a la formación doctoral. Revista Argentina de Educación Superior, 1(1), 201-216.

Novak, J. D. (2000). Conocimiento y aprendizaje. España: Alianza.

Novak, J. D., y Cañas, A. J. (2006). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct them. (C. M. Miller, Trad.) Recuperado de http://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/pdf/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf

Puks, R. (2016). Software Tools for Supporting Literature Reviews: An Overview and a Case Study. (Tesis de maestría). Tallinn University, School of Digital Technologies.

Scarano, E. R. (2017). La tesis de doctorado en administración. Ciencias Administrativas, 9(5), 17-28.

Student Learning Centre of University of Otago. (2016). Writing a Literature Review. Recuperado de http://www.otago.ac.nz/hedc/otago615355.pdf

Vermeulen, F. (2007). I shall not remain insignificant: Adding a second loop to matter more. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 754-761.

Webster, J., y Watson, R. T. (Jun de 2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xii-xxii.

Published

2018-09-02

How to Cite

Barrientos, J. W. (2018). The bibliographic review in the doctorate in Administration. Ciencias Administrativas, (14), 049. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e049

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.