Open science practices: Benefits and challenges for implementation

Authors

  • Nicolás Alessandroni Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe182

Keywords:

ciencia abierta, investigación científica, cultura científica, política científica

Abstract

 Open science is the practice of conducting research ensuring that all processes and outcomes are openly available and accessible to everyone with minimal barriers. Implementing open science involves concrete changes in research methods. In this presentation, I introduce the general framework of open science and consider the benefits and challenges associated with preprints, open peer review, open access, open data, preregistration, and large-scale collaborations. The discussion demonstrates that implementing open science brings remarkable advantages to research in psychology and the social sciences.

References

Alessandroni, N. y Byers-Heinlein, K. (2022). Ten strategies to foster open science in psychology and beyond. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 57545. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.57545

Anglada, L. y Abadal, E. (2018). ¿Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario ThinkEPI, 12, 292–298. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43

Baumgartner, H. A., Alessandroni, N., Byers-Heinlein, K., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Soderstrom, M., Voelkel, J. G., Willer, R., Yuen, F. y Coles, N. A. (2023). How to build up big team science: A practical guide for large-scale collaborations. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), 230235. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230235

Bezjak, S., Conzett, P., Fernandes, P. L., Görögh, E., Helbig, K., Kramer, B., Labastida, I., Niemeyer, K., Psomopoulos, F., Ross-Hellauer, T., Schneider, R., Tennant, J., Verbakel, E., Clyburne-Sherin, A., Brinken, H. y Heller, L. (2019). Manual de capacitación sobre Ciencia Abierta (N. Alessandroni, R. Melero, R. Rogel y C. Vilches, Eds.). CEPAL - Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe / FOSTER Plus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2588214

Byers-Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C., Davies, C., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Kline, M., Kominsky, J. F., Kosie, J. E., Lew-Williams, C., Liu, L., Mastroberardino, M., Singh, L., Waddell, C. P. G., Zettersten, M. y Soderstrom, M. (2020). Building a collaborative psychological science: Lessons learned from ManyBabies 1. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000216

Byers‐Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C. y Savalei, V. (2021). Six solutions for more reliable infant research. Infant and Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2296

Fressoli J. M. y Arza V. (2018). Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 15(2), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.60616

Heise, C. y Pearce, J. M. (2020). From open access to open science: The path from scientific reality to open scientific communication. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402091590. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020915900

Kathawalla, U.-K., Silverstein, P. y Syed, M. (2021). Easing into open science: A guide for graduate students and their advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 18684. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Alessandroni, N. (2024). Open science practices: Benefits and challenges for implementation. Journal of Psychology, 23(2), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe182

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>