Theoretical contributions to organizational management: Developments in the visión of the organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e013Keywords:
Organizational change, strategy, Development.Abstract
This paper tries to conduct an analysis of organizational theories over time, starting from the paradigm shift proposed by systems theory. This change will focus on the post-modern perspective, likewise is based on the theoretical position of organizational studies, as well as the use of the metaphor of the organism. For which the aim is to make segmentation, where strategy and organizational change according to the appearance of these in time and context in which each one has been submitted. Consequently, this will allow contextualizing the changes that have arisen concerning the perception of the organization and display of the man in it. In order to outline the knowledge provided by the proposed theories and adapt the contexts that addresses each one of them. All this, with the intention to find important factors that supports an evolution theory.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aldrich, H. E. (1993). ''Incommensurable Paradigms? Vital Signs from Three Perspectives'', en Reed, M. and Hughes, M. Rethinking Organization. New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis (17-45). London: Sage.
Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
Ballina, F. (2006). Diferencias en la administración pre moderna, moderna y posmoderna: propuestas para un debate en Latinoamérica. Problemas de Desarrollo, 37 (144), 222-233.
Barba Álvarez, A. (2013). Administración, teoría de la organización y estudios organizacionales: tres campos de conocimiento, tres identidades. Gestión y estrategia, 44(4), 139-151.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory revitalization or decline? Journal of management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
Berrone, P. & Gómez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: an integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (1), 103–126.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1986). Teoría General de Sistemas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Canales, S. A. (2007). La Teoría del Principal-Agente en el análisis de la política científica. X Congreso nacional de investigación educativa, educación, ciencia y tecnología. Veracruz, Veracruz.
Chandler (1962). Estrategia y estructura. Boston: MIT PRESS.
Di Maggio, P. J. y Powell, W.W. (1983). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Drucker, P. (1955a). Management Science and the manager. Management Science, 1 (2), 115-126.
Drucker, P. (1955b). The management horizon. The Journal of Business, 28 (3), 155-164.
Drucker, P. (1999). Peter Drucker on the new business realities. The antitrust Bulletin, 44 (4), 795-819.
Evan, W. M. (1967). La órbita de la organización: Hacia una teoría de las relaciones interorganizacionales. Buenos Aires: OMEBA.
Fernández, M. y Marín, L.M. (2009). El estudio del agente principal en la agricultura. El Trimestre Económico, 76 (304), 941-964.
Ganga, F. y Burotto, J.F. (2012). Asimetrías de información entre agente y principal de las universidades chilenas. Estudios Gerenciales, 28 (122), 83-104.
García García, B. C., Pinto Iglesias, T., & Piñero Martín, M. L. (2007). Evolución de la ciencia y la teoría del conocimiento. Saber científico de Popper, Kuhn y Lakatos. Agora Trujillo, 10(20).
Gorganeff, Y. (2003). Teoría del agente-principal y el mercadeo. Revista Universidad EAFIT, (129), 75-87.
Grant, R. (1991), "The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation", California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization Theory. Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, pp. 2-12.
Katz, D. y Kahn, R.L. (1977). Psicología Social de las Organizaciones. México: Trillas.
McGahan, A. M., y Porter, M. E. (1997). How much does industry matter, really? Strategic management journal, 15-30.
Meyer, J. W., y Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management science, 24(9), 934-948.
Morgan, G. (1990). Imágenes de la organización. Madrid: RA-MA Editorial.
Nonaka, I., y Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University press, New York: Oxford.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Sharpe.
Pettigrew, A. (1977). STRATEGY FORMULATION AS A POLITICAL PROCESS. International Studies of Management & Organization, 7(2), 78-87.
Perrow, C. (1984). ''La historia del zoológico o la vida en el arenal organizativo'', en Salaman, Graemme y Kenneth Thompson, Control e Ideología en las organizaciones (pp. 293-314). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Pfeffer, J. (2000). Nuevos rumbos en la Teoría de la Organización. Problemas y posibilidades. México: Oxford.
Porter, M. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy.Harvard Business Review, 21-38.
Porter, M.(1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of management review, 6(4), 609-620.
Porter, M. (2004). Ventaja Competitiva: creación y sostenimiento de un desempeño superior, 16a reimpresión. CECSA, México.
Porter, M. (2007). La ventaja competitiva de las naciones. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 69-95.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative science quarterly, 1-33.
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., y Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
Scott, R. W. (1981). Organizations. Rational, Natural and Open Systems. New Jersey: Prentice.
Torras Arruga, L. (1997). Aprender: la ventaja competitiva más sostenible en el tiempo. Alta Dirección, 31(191), 13-19.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(1), 171-180.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal, agree with the following terms:
a. Authors will retain its copyright and will ensure the rights of first publication of its work to the journal, which will be at the same time subject to the Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) allowing third parties to share the work as long as the author and the first publication on this journal is indicated.
b. Authors may elect other non-exclusive license agreements of the distribution of the published work (for example: locate it on an institutional telematics file or publish it on an monographic volume) as long as the first publication on this journal is indicated,
c. Authors are allowed and suggested to disseminate its work through the internet (for example: in institutional telematics files or in their website) before and during the submission process, which could produce interesting exchanges and increase the references of the published work. (see The effect of open Access)
