Open science and the evaluation of scientific production

Authors

  • María Cristina Piro Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
  • Soledad Cottone Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina
  • Marisa R. De Giusti Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Consorcio Iberoamericano para Educación en Ciencia y Tecnología, Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2422-6322

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe183

Keywords:

ciencia abierta, evaluación académica, impacto, políticas institucionales

Abstract

 This manuscript contains the transcription of the exchange1 between María Cristina Piro, Soledad Cottone, and Marisa De Giusti on open science and the evaluation of scientific production, which took place during the final session of the event Psychology (with)Open Science, moderated by Nicolás Alessandroni.

Downloads

Metrics

Visualizaciones del PDF
50
Dec 28 '24Dec 31 '24Jan 01 '25Jan 04 '25Jan 07 '25Jan 10 '25Jan 13 '25Jan 16 '25Jan 19 '25Jan 22 '25Jan 25 '257.0
|

Author Biography

María Cristina Piro, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina

Profesora Titular Ordinaria de Psicopatología II (infanto-juvenil), Directora del Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Psicoanálisis y Psicopatología (LIPPSI) y Decana de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP). Es Profesora y Licenciada en Psicología (UNLP), Especialista en Clínica Psicoanalítica con Adultos (UNLP-Colegio de Psicólogos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires) y Especialista en Psicología Clínica con Orientación en Niños y Adolescentes (Colegio de Psicólogos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires). 

References

Alessandroni, N. y Byers-Heinlein, K. (2022). Ten strategies to foster open science in psychology and beyond. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 57545. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.57545

Ancion, Z., Borrell-Damián, L., Mounier, P., Rooryck, J. y Saenen, B. (2022). Action plan for diamond open access. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6282403

Anglada, L. y Abadal, E. (2018). ¿Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario ThinkEPI, 12, 292–298. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43

Baumgartner, H. A., Alessandroni, N., Byers-Heinlein, K., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Soderstrom, M., Voelkel, J. G., Willer, R., Yuen, F. y Coles, N. A. (2023). How to build up big team science: A practical guide for large-scale collaborations. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), 230235. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230235

Bezjak, S., Conzett, P., Fernandes, P. L., Görögh, E., Helbig, K., Kramer, B., Labastida, I., Niemeyer, K., Psomopoulos, F., Ross-Hellauer, T., Schneider, R., Tennant, J., Verbakel, E., Clyburne-Sherin, A., Brinken, H. y Heller, L. (2019). Manual de capacitación sobre Ciencia Abierta (N. Alessandroni, R. Melero, R. Rogel y C. Vilches, Eds.). CEPAL - Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe / FOSTER Plus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2588214

Buranyi, S. (2017, 27 de junio). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. Disponible en https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Byers-Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C., Davies, C., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Kline, M., Kominsky, J. F., Kosie, J. E., Lew-Williams, C., Liu, L., Mastroberardino, M., Singh, L., Waddell, C. P. G., Zettersten, M. y Soderstrom, M. (2020). Building a collaborative psychological science: Lessons learned from ManyBabies 1. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000216

Byers‐Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C. y Savalei, V. (2021). Six solutions for more reliable infant research. Infant and Child Development, 31(5), e2296. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2296

Else, H. (2020). Nature journals reveal terms of open-science adoption. Nature, 588, 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03324-y

Fressoli J. M. y Arza V. (2018). Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 15(2), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.60616

Heise, C. y Pearce, J. M. (2020). From open access to open science: The path from scientific reality to open scientific communication. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402091590. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020915900

Imming, M. y Tennant, J. (2018). Sticker open science: just science done right (ENG). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285575

Kathawalla, U.-K., Silverstein, P. y Syed, M. (2021). Easing into open science: A guide for graduate students and their advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 18684. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684

Rouder, J. [@JeffRouder]. (2017, 5 de diciembre). What is open science? It is endeavoring to preserve the rights of others to reach independent conclusions about your data and work [Post]. Twitter.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Piro, M. C., Cottone, S., & De Giusti, M. R. (2024). Open science and the evaluation of scientific production. Journal of Psychology, 23(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.24215/2422572Xe183

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 23(2) (2024) / Dossier: Ciencia abierta para la investigacion en psicologia y ciencias sociales

Section

Dossiers

License

Copyright (c) 2024 María Cristina Piro, Soledad Cottone, Marisa R. De Giusti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

cc-by logo image result 

Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: 

    1. Authors retain the copyright and assign the right of first publication to the journal, with the work registered under a  Creative Commons attribution license (CC-BY), which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
    2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this magazine.
    3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g., on institutional or personal webpages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access ).